Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Ignition timing on 1949 ES2

Forums

Could anyone please shed light on what the correct figure should be for this engine - I have the club Single DVD which gives the figure as 38 degrees for a late(ish) Model 50 being reassembled. Figures I do have vary e.g. 1962 Norton Maintenance Manual gives 38 degrees or 17/32" or 13.5mm; 1959 Norton Maintenance Manual gives 7/16" or 11.11mm (seems about right for my '49 engine?) and a Norton Singles book gives the figure of 3/8".

Any help appreciated. Thankyou.

Permalink

John- Main-Smith reprint of the Norton workshop manual for my 1950 ES 2 gives the ignition timing in piston travel and calls for 5/8 " BTDC with the mag set on full advance. I have ( with my daughter's help as she is the math wizard ! ) worked out the math solution via trigonometry to convert this to degrees of rotation. Given a 79 mm stroke ( 39.5 mm crankshaft throw) and a 7'' connecting rod length this equates to 41.622 degrees BTDC. I checked this by measuring the piston travel with a dial indicator and degree wheel/pointer set up and it was spot on- I do not know if these figures apply to your 1949 engine & I hope I haven't confused you further .Perhaps another member will know if the timing specs for 1949 are the same as for 1950 - Hope this helps-Richard

Permalink

iv just done my es2 motor i just put piston tdc

then have the valves rocking each side of tdc slight overlap runs spot on

fast rev good starting

Permalink

Previously wrote

Much obliged Richard - I'm confident that the figures will be the same 1949 or 1950 (don't think the engine changed between those years). I'm going to use piston travel of 5/8". Did you mean 100mm stroke for your ES2?

Thanks again - John

Permalink

John (both Francis & Whiting !)- My apologies and I am feeling very foolish! The figures I gave you were indeed based upon a 100 mm stroke and in my reply I quoted the bore- that would have been a short stroke engine indeed ! Again, these are for ignition on full advance. Interestingly I have tried to gauge points opening with both the slip of paper method and by continuity across the points with a multimeter and the result was the same either way so the paper method is fine with me. Sorry for any more confusion from over here in the colonies- Richard

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans