Skip to main content
000000 000003 000006 000009 000012 000015 000018 000021 000024 000027 000030 000033 000036 000039 000042 000045 000048 000051 000054 000057 000060 000063 000066 000069 000072 000075 000078 000081 000084 000087 000090 000093 000096 000099 000102 000105 000108 000111 000114 000117 000120 000123 000126 000129 000132 000135 000138 000141 000144 000147 000150 000153 000156 000159 000162 000165 000168 000171 000174 000177 000180 000183 000186 000189 000192 000195 000198 000201 000204 000207 000210 000213 000216 000219 000222 000225 000228 000231 000234 000237 000240 000243 000246 000249 000252 000255 000258 000261 000264 000267 000270 000273 000276 000279 000282 000285 000288 000291 000294 000297 000300 000303 000306 000309 000312 000318 000321 000324 000327 000330 000333 000336 000339 000342 000345 000348 000351 000354 000357 000360 000363 000366 000369 000372 000375 000378 000381 000384 000387 000390 000393 000396 000399 000402 000405 000408 000411 000414 000417 000420 000423 000426 000429 000432 000435 000438 000441 000444 000447 000450 000453 000456 000459 000462 000465 000468 000471 000474 000477 000480 000483 000486 000489 000492 000495 000498 000501 000504 000507 000510 000513 000516 000519 000522 000525 000528 000531 000534 000537 000540 000543 000546 000549 000552 000555 000558 000561 000564 000567 000570 000573 000576 000579 000582 000585 000588 000591 000594 000597 000600 000603 000606 000609 000612 000615 000618 000621 000624 000627 000630 000633 000636 000639 000642 000645 000648 000651 000654 000657 000660 000663 000666 000669 000672 000675 000678 000681 000684 000687 000690 000693 000696 000699 000702 000705 000708 000711 000714 000717 000720 000723 000726 000729 000732 000735 000738 000741 000744 000747 000750 000753 000756 000759 000762 000765 000768 000771 000774 000777 000780 000783 000786 000789 000792 000795 000798 000801 000804 000807 000810 000813 000816 000819 000822 000825 000828 000831 000834 000837 000840 000843 000846 000849 000852 000855 000858 000861 000864 000867 000870 000873 000876 000879 000882
English French German Italian Spanish

Roadholder Forks

A review of correspondence from NOC-L

Some details about Roadholder forks, how to alter the damping characteristics
and views on fork oil vs. automatic transmission fluid

 

FAQ - Roadholder fork dimensions

Although many parts of the various versions of the Roadholder fork are interchangeable, one major difference between them, and a constant cause of incorrect sourcing, is the fork stanchion length:-

TYPE FITTED TO LENGTH
 Manx    20.375"
 Short Roadholder    21.843"
 Long Roadholder    23.312"
 Commando    23.161"

  

FAQ - Roadholder fork yokes

YOKE FITTED TO
 7"  
 7.3/8"  

 

Some Roadholder fork Part. Nos.

Short Roadholder forks were pre- Featherbed; for example, Norton fitted them on the Nomad. When production moved to the Matchless factory, these parts (or rather, design) started appearing on the G/N15CS for the 1964-65 model year. Damper parts, springs and stanchions were adopted from the 1963 Matchless G80CS forks in modified form, thus different from the Roadster range - a fact often overlooked. For 1966 costs had to be slashed further, and the offroad models took to many Roadster parts (see below). The parts you need in order to fit long Roadholders with external springs, are as per 1964-65 G/N15CS:-

 30457  Tube, main  2 off    23¼" long
 30440  Damper, tube  2 off  
 17357  Rod, damper  2 off  as per 1963 Matchless forks
 10721  Peg, locating damp.  2 off  as per 1963 Matchless forks
 16304  Cup, valve, damper  2 off  as per 1963 Matchless forks
 10719  Damper valve  2 off  as per 1963 Matchless forks
   Nut, rod  2 off  as per 1963 Matchless forks
 16072  Sleeve, damper  2 off  as per 1963 Matchless forks
 16339  Clip, sleeve  2 off  as per 1963 Matchless forks
 30446  Bolt,top,main tube  2 off  
 30456  Nut,bush retaining  2 off  'hollow bolt' as cited
 T1090  Washer, b.r. nut  2 off  'keyed washer' as cited
 21789  Spring, main  2 off  external springs, Matchless **
 21785  Washer, cover tube  2 off  leather, external springs, Matchless
 30041  Cover tube, top  2 off  if solid covers are fitted
 30453  Extension, slider  2 off  if solid covers are fitted
 30531  Cover tube, top  2 off  if gaiters are fitted
 30453  Extension, slider  2 off  if gaiters are fitted
 20463  Gaiters  2 off  if gaiters are fitted
 ** if 1966-69 G/N15CS main tubes (25" long) are fitted, other dampers (030037) and main springs (030532) need to be used; many other parts are as per the Roadster setup

Most of these parts are available and Matchless fork parts are plentiful as well (ask Russell Motors). I believe stanchions are available from Fair Spares under part no. 06-3423PF for pre-Featherbed models but as noted, the bush retaining design may be slightly different compared to the pre-Featherbed set-up; 030446 and 030457 numbers suggest a Matchless redesign. A number of other parts which these forks had in common with Roadster forks have not been listed.

Knut Soensteby (knut.sonsteby@lhg.hib.no) on NOC-L 22nd. May 1997


Altering fork damping characteristics

Compression damping on Roadholder forks is controlled by the two holes at the bottom of the damper tube. To increase compression damping, the holes can be welded up and drilled smaller. To decrease damping, drill the original holes larger. Firstly, make sure the damper piston to tube clearance is not excessive due to worn parts. There are no holes at the top of damper tube for rebound damping, but damping is controlled by fit of the alloy damper tube cap on the damper rod and again the piston to tube clearance. The cap is usually worn out if the forks have not received regular fluid changes and become water contaminated. The water then rusts the damper rod which becomes sort of a file and enlarges the cap's inner diameter. I don't think anything can be done to increase rebound damping other than using heavier weight fork oil and ensuring that the damper tube cap is in good condition.

Gary Slabaugh (gdslabaugh@sprintmail.com) on NOC-L 22nd. May 1997


Altering fork damping characteristics - a reference

I remember reading about a modification to Roadholders that involved welding up and redrilling the holes in the tube. This was in a thick photocopied digest that a buddy picked up at the Norton Rally at Taho Nevada in 1991, I think. Anyway, I recently bought the Tech. Digest and couldn't find the article. The instructions in the mystery article were quite detailed and explicit (a series of holes decreasing in size and all that; it even gave hole diameters).

Thomas Allen (thomasa@halcyon.com) on NOC-L 27th. May 1997


Higher vs. lower viscosity fork oil

As you may have noted, Norton commando reference material(s) suggest several grades, viscosities, and types of oil may be used for the front forks. I believe that the key things to consider are the expected service (i.e. severe front brake use and exhaust grinding turns versus normal street use - whatever that may mean), and the riders preference.

Naturally, the higher viscosity oils will provide greater rebound damping. On the Commando I road race, I started with a generic 20 weight oil. As my riding skills improved, I found that the front wheel would begin to patter a bit in some turns, and under hard braking, the front wheel would also tend to skip and lock up. After increasing the fork oil viscosity to 30 weight and slightly increasing the spring preload, the pattering and skipping seems to have ceased - for now.

I have used off-the-shelf fork oils. Since the change of front fork oil is not too difficult on the Commando, I suggest that you may want to experiment and find the 'type' oil that is suitable for you.

John Magyar (wimcjjm@aol.com) on NOC-L 19th. May 1998


Bel-Ray shock oil

If you replace your stock springs with Progressive Suspension springs, there is a big difference right there. I like Bel-Ray shock oil.

Thomas W. Kullen (utahnorton@sisna.com) on NOC-L 19th. May 1998


Use standard oil as recommended

I prefer using fork oil; I think ATF is too light for Norton forks. It might work well in a late model machine but for Norton forks I think not.

John Ebert (jmebert@worldnet.att.net) on NOC-L 20th. May 1998


Modify the damper tubes and use more fork oil than recommended

I race a Commando and discovered the shortcoming of Roadholder forks. Although most references say to fill with 150cc of oil, this usually still leaves some air in the top of the damper tube, and results in the forks 'topping out' on the rebound. Try between 175 and 200cc per leg. If you want to get more accurate, pull one leg apart and refit the damper tube/rod without the stanchion. Measure how much oil is needed to cover the top of the damper tube. This is a maximum, as the stanchion will displace some oil when re-fitted.

The biggest problem is pattering through corners. This seems to be from the lack of compression damping in the design - they rely on oil passing through the large holes at the bottom of the damper tube. I have fitted some shells inside my damper tubes that block the exit holes on the compression stroke and uncover them on the rebound stroke. This means that on the compression stroke, the oil can only exit past the small clearance gap between the damper rod and the alloy damper cap, i.e. compression damping! I currently use 7.5 weight fork oil like Jap bikes. The system works well on undulations and acts as an anti-dive under brakes. I'm still working on a high-pressure bleed mechanism for fast sharp bumps - they're still coming through to the bars.

Geoff Haines (ghaines@jands.com.au) on NOC-L 20th. May 1998

 

Norton Owners Club Website by White-Hot Design

Privacy Policy