Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

650SS Clocks - Speedo and Tacho

Forums

Hi,

Sent my very sad tooking speedo and tacho to Stuart Walker at Classic Speedometers for refurbishment. It turns out they were not the right ones  for my bike at all,  but from some 70s BSA or Triumph - the tacho even had the wrong ratio (apparently 4:1 instead of the correct 2:1 as it runs off the cam). I never ran the bike (apparently it has not run for 40 years) so can't comment.

Stuart very kindly offered to take my  clocks and swap  them for the right ones, however we seem to have conflicting info on what the speedo should be. The info I can find suggests 150mph, with trip mileometer and dark grey face. Tacho is 10,000 rpm also with grey face. Anyone disagree?

In addition, does anyone know the correct ratio or revs/mile for the speedo  drive off the rear wheel?

So far I'm really impressed with  Stuart and his company - he seems to really care about doing the right thing for the customer.  classic-speedometers.com

Cheers,

 

Permalink

What year is your 650SS? They started with Chronometric instruments, changing to Magnetics in 1964.

For that year, the speedo was SSM.3002/00; 2:1 drive. Rev-counter RSM.3003/00 8000rpm; 2:1 drive.

9000rpm & 10000rpm rev-counters were 4:1 drive.

However, yours may not be that year. 

Permalink

Thanks Ian,

Sorry - should've said my bike is registered 1967. The clocks that came off were magnetic - I researched the numbers before I sent them to Stuart as I believe he  specialises in magnetics. I knew magnetics were right for that year.

Looking at an article on a restored bike (built '65, registered '66) in Classic Bike Guide magazine of Feb 2013, it says that the owner fitted 'the correct Smiths grey-faced 150mph speedometer and rev counter' The associated photo showed a 150mph speedo, with trip and a 10,000rpm rev-counter.

So you reckon SSM 3002/00 speedo and 2:1 drive - is 10,000 tacho still 3003/00 number but 4:1 drive?

Cheers,

 

Permalink

A 10000rpm tacho will have a different number, for sure.

The 1966 spec; I don't have 1967 info; is as follows:

Speedo SSM3001/00A; 120mph speedo, black face, with trip mileage; 2:1 drive. This is more likely to be correct for your bike that the 1964 offering.

Tacho RSM3003/00A 8000rpm, black face. 2:1 drive.

This is fact, cross-referenced, as well as being the exact ones fitted to my bike; I have just looked to check!

A 10,000rpm tacho for that year would be RSM3003/01; 4:1 drive. I don't know why Norton would fit a 10,000rpm tacho...?

Whether they changed for 1967 I don't know. I have just checked 1965 spec, which confirms as being the same as 1966. As you see, the numbers changed slightly from 1964; the first year of magnetics; to 1965. Did they change again for 1967? I don't know.

As for the magazine article, the instruments they mention do not match Smith's own data, or others which I have cross-referenced, or my own.

Surprise surprise!

Ian

Permalink

Ian,

Just looked at the gearboxes - the tacho is 1:1 drive but as it drives from the camshaft I guess that makes it 2:1 ref engine speed. Does this mean I can't use a 10k tacho?

The rear wheel/speedo gearbox is definitely 2:1 ratio - it says so on the body and I did test the ratio.

Cheers

Permalink

Leonard. Yes, you need the 8000rpm one.

Here is a pic of the 1965/66 spec. clocks.

Light switch should be on the clock mounting plate btw, but I prefer it in the headlamp. Keeps all that wiring out of sight and the weather.

Ian

Attachments
Permalink

My Mercury is 1969 and has dark grey magnetic speedo and rev counter.  The speedo is 120mph,SSM-3001/00B (1600) and the tacho is a 10,000rpm RSM-3003/01A.

I cannot verify whether these are correct as the machine was re-imported from Canada and various "modifications" (or bodges) were carried out before I owned it.  I would have expected a 120mph speedo rather than 150mph, but perhaps the 650SS performance required the faster speedo!

My tacho works fine but the speedo reads lower than actual speed, so I'll now check the gearbox on the back wheel.

The tacho drive gearbox for the Mercury is BG1508/05 and is a 1:1 ratio, reversing type.

Philip

Permalink

From the -68 650SS.

Metric version of the 120MPH one.Bezel on the speedo shows signs of that it has been opened. They did not manage to put the glass and sticker straight. The 8000 RPM RSM 3003/00A tacho seems untampered as seen in the picture.

Speedo

Attachments
Permalink

Thanks guys - I thought I was asking a stupid question - but apparently not. Lots to take in.

Just to throw more fuel on the fire, here's an old road test from 1962, when the 650SS was introduced, confirming the 150mph speedo (in 1962 anyway).

Also, here's the pic from the February 2013 Classic Bike Guide showing the speedo and tacho from the restored bike reviewed. The article says this bike was built in 1965 and registered in 1966. It also says that the bike was fitted with 'the correct Smiths grey faced 150mph speedometer and rev counter' (tacho is 10,000rpm)

(sorry - files are too big to upload - I'll try and compress them and upload them later)

Ian - I just bought a new headlamp shell from Norvil (replacing a rather rusty version of one like yours), taking only ammeter, and a bracket like yours for which I will need to buy a new switch as mine doesn't fit the hole in the bracket. I share your view that having the switch in the headlamp is better for the reasons you give, but thought I should make it standard for originality - possibly regretting that now!

Cheers,

Permalink

Leonard. It may well be that in 1962 the 650SS was fitted with a 150mph speedo, but it is not relevant to our discussion, as they were Chronometric. As I said, Magnetics replaced Chronometrics on Nortons in 1964; most of them, anyway. The Police bikes continued with Chronometrics for some while after. I know the Model 99 had a 120mph speedo in 1962, with a slightly different spec. number to the 650, so that could explain it.

Yes, mine only has a toggle switch for the lights, but originality is not so vital for me, as I have a 1964 650SS engine in a 1955 Wideline frame, with late Atlas front end, early Commando tls front brake and mudguards etc..... all Norton, but spanning about 15 years!

As I said regarding the magazine article, have you never noticed mistakes and mis-information in Mortons Media comics before? They are riddled with them. Not a reliable source from which to shell out your hard-earned, without cross-referencing first. I would rather trust Smiths Instruments own data from the period, or Norton's own, if you could find it.

I am a little intrigued about the description of a dark grey face. I have a couple of 60mm grey-faced Magnetics on other machines, but they are a fairly light grey. I was not aware of the dark grey. Is the assumption that all Magnetics had these dark grey faces? Mine look black to me, but under glass, maybe not? Phil?

Quick edit - looking a Mikael's photo of his RSM.3003/00A tacho, the face does look dark grey. If mine is dark grey, it is a lot darker than that! Mine have been rebuilt at some stage, so maybe the interpretation of dark grey was a little flexible....

Cheers

Ian

Permalink

When I look at my meters in different light, shade of grey differs much. My pics was taken in much light, so they appears to have a much lighter shade than they do outdoors on a cloudy day.

Permalink

Thanks Ian,

I completely take both your points.

Don't know why Norton would logically revert to 120 speedo from 150 chronometric but I know from working in the automotive industry for many  years that product spec decisions are not always logical!

I also share your view on reliability of the press - again from many years.....etc!! (Even when I gave them the right words!!)

I'm beginning to wonder if it really matters as long as the bike looks ok and the clocks work with my gearboxes - I can't imagine I'll be doing 120mph+ or 8000rpm+ on this bike anyway!

So i shall look at all these fine comments again, talk to Stuart at Classic Speedometers and find a pragmatic plan.

Thanks for all your help everybody. Here are the files I mentioned earlier.

Cheers.

Permalink

Leonard. Logic, as you say, wasn't always followed. It was not Norton by then, it was AMC. Product standardisation would have come into play. They were almost on their uppers by 1965. The Magnetic speedos most certainly were 120mph items, including trip (Alan; you can see the trip in Mikael's and my photos!)), for most of their run; I can't speak after 1966 however.

If you have a pair of nice clocks which look period, unless you are after concours awards, I shouldn't worry too much. Having said that, Magnetics are way cheaper to have work done on than Chronometrics. You pays yer money etc.......

Ian

 

Permalink

Have had a busy weekend so haven't been keeping up with these comments.  I've inspected my speedo and tacho and the main outer part of the face is very dark, more black than grey, but the inner centre of the dials are light grey.  The reflection on the glass makes it difficult to see the colours clearly.

When the Mercury was in production the standard machine only had a speedo, so any tacho was an extra or added later by a subsequent owner.  I agree with Ian, put on your period clocks and enjoy the machine.  A problem with Magnetics is that refitting the bezel as it needs a roller to gently turn it over the flange; a friend with a lathe helped me replace the broken glass.

Philip.

 

Permalink

Thanks Philip,

Just cleaned up my tacho drive and found the number - same as yours - BG1508/05 and turns as 1:1 ratio.

Len

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans