Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Clutch impossibly heavy to operate - done everything - what's wrong ?

Forums

Bike is 1959 Model 50 - having replaced just about every part the clutch is impossibly heavy to operate. My left forearm is like 'popeye's'. It works for normal gear changing when moving but doesn't appear to disengage enough to allow selection of neutral when at a standstill. This struggle to select neutral seems worse when the engine and gearbox are hot. i.e. Impossible ! 

I have a new clutch lever and cable. Cable is carefully routed for easy movement. I've replaced all the clutch operating parts in the gearbox. New clutch push rod. I've replaced all friction & plain plates. I've replaced all shock absorber rubbers, roller cage and rollers. New clutch springs (these are slightly longer than the ones I removed - assuming old ones were 'tired'). Primary chain is new and not over tight. Cable adjustment is to the book. 

Where do I look now ? Could it be that I need more play where the new clutch plates interfere with the clutch body and clutch sprocket ? i.e. should I file the plate tongues ?  Is there something amiss with the assembly of the operating mechanism in the gearbox ? Help !

 

Permalink

New springs?.  There are some duds out there, try the old ones. Only compress enough to kick it over without slippage.

Permalink

... is the pivot to nipple centre distance on the lever? I'm not sure what yours should be (mine for a laydown box is 1 1/16") but if it's too big (as most aftermarket levers are) it will require a huge effort. Small distance = less effort required.

Having said that, you also report what sounds like dragging which suggests that there's not enough lift.

I assume the "AMC" type gearbox - have you checked that the operating lever in the box outer case is correctly located?

In reply to by ian_soady

Permalink

Pivot to nipple on an AMC box should be 7/8", same as a Velocette, Grove Classics sell suitable levers.

The difficult selection is due to dragging, reduce the pushrod end clearance,  but make sure that you have at least 1/8" because it decreases when hot and you can then get slipping.

Permalink

The model 50 isn't a torque monster, so it could be worth trying it with a plate removed (just one, not one of each). Obviously needs enough 'grip' to start it and ensure no slip when in top gear, but less plates = more lift for the ones stiĺl there. This did work for another member with a M50.

Regards, 

George 

Permalink

Have you got the correct operating arm in the gearbox? The ones for diaphragm clutches have different profiles, but look nearly identical.

Is the arm at 90 degrees to the cable?

Permalink

Got to agree with Robert on this puzzle. Your replacement, longer springs are probably too heavy and/or becoming coilbound.  Unlike cylinder head valve springs which get seriously cooked with each long ride the clutch springs tend to have a much easier life and do not shorten as much with use.

Put the old springs back and see if this sorts the issue.

Attachment gives some clutch spring lengths.

Buckled plates ?      I had a similar problem. Someone suggested buckled clutch plates due to overheating from slipping clutch. When I skimmed  the clutch plates on a flat surface they were buckled (see image of uneven wear. The reverse would show contra wear ). It explained all the symptoms I experienced. To overcome the buckle, I had overtightened the clutch springs as an attempt to deal with the slip . This then made clutch action heavy and the lack of lift on the plates  (because of the buckle) caused the clutch to drag and find neutral . The solution was to skim the plates parallel and everything was good there after.

GRAHAM

Attachments
Permalink

While you are re-fitting the old springs  have a look at the outside faces of the spring cups which can get ridges worn on them from contact with the center face plate. 

The Model 50 already should have less plates as standard, 3 pairs + single sided as opposed to 4 pairs + single sided on the ES2 and twins. To keep everything else the same it also had a different, much deeper, pressure plate, this was pure penny pinching to save a couple of bob as it is no lighter to operate, just slips more easily, I have an ES2 clutch on mine.

If it has the standard pressure plate it needs to have 9 plates,if it has the M50 pressure it needs to have seven.

Is this a familiar bike that was running ok before, or is it a built-up bike out for the first time?

Niall,

        This is a familiar bike. How do I tell the difference between a standard pressure plate and a M50 pressure plate ? The one I have was on the bike when I purchased it 4 years ago. As previously stated, all plates have been replaced with new ones with the 'corked' plates almost certainly thicker than the ones I took out. Will consider reducing number of plates.

Thanks,

Mike 

Robert,

           In pursuit of a solution to my problemI have purchased two sets of springs, one from RGM and one from Andover. Both are the same length and both longer by about 1/16" than the old ones I removed. May put old ones back.

Thanks,

Mike

In reply to by ian_soady

Permalink

Ian

It is an AMC box. Operating lever and all associated parts are new and correctly located. I purchased a clutch lever with a 1 1/16" fulcrum (a direct replacement for the old lever). Although harder to operate than one with a 7/8" fulcrum I assumed the extra lift would help with freeing the clutch plates.I didn't consider the idea of reducing the operating effort with a shorter fulcrum length. May go for 7/8" and fewer plates.

Thanks,

Mike 

Permalink

Because some bikes need them. The laydown and earlier boxes move the pushrod less for a given movement of the cable so need that extra travel (and the effort is commensurately less). My ES2 has 1.1/16 clutch and 7/8" front brake as the latter needs all the help it can get.......

As said, Grove sell 7/8" levers as does Steve Surbey at AMC spares.

Mike 

The standard pressure plate, where the taper section finishes at the clutch plate end has just a slight lip, say 1/16", the M50 one carries on at the larger diameter for about 5/16" IIRC. I'm at work just now so I can't  measure it but it is a big enough difference that you couldn't  mistake it once you know.

Permalink

The different lever pivot centers will make a considerable improvement to the pull effort ,but of course the reduction in lift also  means that everything else needs to be correct. With clutch springs I found that length is not the only thing that needs to be correct. Spring wire  gauge and temper are important too. As just about everything we buy is made (we hope!) to pattern there is always the possibility that some changes have crept in unnoticed. I am never in a rush to discard orriginal parts but there is also a need to keep the supply chain working. Hey ho. 

Permalink

HI Mike Have you changed the clutch centre ( spider) it could be the early centers had lips on the ends of the splines and they get crushed over time and let the back of the centre bind on the sleeve gear ( sprocket carrier ). The later centres have a full washer fix in it for the spring washer and nut to hold the clutch on to the main shaft. I have found this fairly common.  

In reply to by peter_weait

Permalink

Hi Mike. If you have not yet solved the problem, I have another suggestion. Take all the clutch plates out and check the order they should be put back with the diagram in the handbook. I have seen a clutch with a plain plate innermost. It then needs the springs screwed in too far to stop clutch slip......and an impossibly heavy feel at the handlebar lever. 

Best of luck......Doug

Not sure if you are Doug or Richard, but Hi anyway,

My clutch basket has friction pads in it (actually made of cork - new and fitted by me), hence the first plate has to be plain. Obviously I can't run a friction plate against it. Strange, as the exploded diagram of the clutch in the Norton Spare parts List for 1959 models (publication PS 206) does NOT show corks (friction pads) in the basket. This complicates the number of plates calculation. M50 should have three plates, but as it has friction pads in it, is the basket counted as a plate ?

Another complication I have is the pressure plate. The part number in PS 206 for a Model 50 is 040393 (No one appears to sell these, only 040365s). My existing pressure plate has the number 040380 stamped inside it - can't find this referenced anywhere ?

Any observations ?

Cheers,

Mike

 

If your clutch chain wheel has inserts then it is older than the bike, the backplate should therefore be a plain one and IIRC you should have four plain and three friction plates with no half and half one, but the main thing is that with the pressure plate you have that there is enough compression left in the springs to allow the clutch to free off before they become coil bound.  If you don't  have  enough plates in that is a real possibility . How many plates and what sort?

Permalink

Clutch pressure plates. Hi again. Doug here (Richard is my son).

I don’t have a pressure plate to compare to the pics. But what I do know is that because the Model 50 had two fewer plates than the ES2, the pressure plate for the M50 curls in more to take up the space.

Hi Niall,

            The current set up of my clutch, from the chain wheel outwards is as follows:

corked chain wheel/plain/friction/plain/friction/plain/friction/plain/friction/plain/pressure plate (part no. 040380 - not found a reference to this number anywhere). So, I have 5 plain & 4 friction plates.

I have tried setting it up with 4 plain and 3 friction plates. This certainly lightens the action but it slips when the bike is kicked over - suggesting wrong pressure plate ?

From the '59 Spares List I should have a pressure plate 040393 for a Model 50, 3 plate set-up. I have 040380 ! What is it ? Maybe I should buy a 040365 pressure plate (ES2,88,99)  & try that, either with 4 or 5 friction plates?

What is the amount of movement I should expect between fully in and fully out ?

Cheers,

Mike

 

Hi Phil, my pressure plate looks like the one on the left in your first photo. According to the parts list it should be 040393 for a Model 50. It is in fact 040380, which I can't find a reference to anywhere. Hence the confusion as to which pressure plate I have.

If, as I've been informed, the corked chain wheel is older than the bike (i.e. not a standard fitment for this model) what 'curved ball' does it throw into the determination of the correct number of plates, and which pressure plate I should fit ?

Mike

Hi Mike,

relax and don't overthink this, the set up you describe should work fine.

 

Take the centre adjuster out of the pressure plate, then assemble your clutch as you described it, tighten the springs up evenly until the kickstart doesn't slip against compression then put your adjuster back in and tighten it up whilst feeling the free play in the pushrod by wiggling the actuator through the round window in the gearbox cover until you have about 1/8" movement where the cable goes on and tighten the locknut. Set the cable with about 1/8" free play also.

This is a starting point, by test adjust the springs  up as necessary, but each time check the free play on the pushrod and cable.

Good luck

Permalink

Getting the clutch to lift and spin evenly  is a bit of  an art.  Not helped  by the drum which has enough slop on its bearing  to wobble and confuse the issue. I set up a dial gauge  which takes out the guesswork and ignores the wobbly drum. I set it up on the pressure plate and take readings at the point the clutch is starting to  drag. New plates will settle down and grip better and may need a couple of adjustments. 

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans