Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Isolastics and Dave Taylor head steady

Forums

Hi Guys, I have started to fit my new Dave Taylor head steady, is the post that the rose joint fits on to really close to the frame clamp? It's about 1/4" gap. Also checking the isolastics by the book, tighten up then loosen one and a half holes I put the feeler gauge in and it was ok at 6thou until I tightened the bolt up and there is no gap! Should I loosen it up more so when I tighten the bolt up there is 6 thou play? Cheers Tony.

Permalink

Don't know re the headsteady but, yes, adjust threaded collar until when the bolt is torqued up you have 0.006" clearance or whatever you want. Remember you have to force the isolastic assembly over to the opposite side from where you are measuring for clearance,

Simon.

Permalink

I have expanded the title of this thread as I don't want us to lose the head steady element amongst all the Isolastics. Anyway, I think the two may be linked.

I'm not sure about the Mk.llls which use a different front Isolastic mounting, but it always looks as if the centre line of a correctly set up Commando engine should not coincide with the centre point of the two front frame tubes. Looking at the bike from the front, the engine centre line - use the barrel base nut for sighting it - lies offset to the right by around 10mm.

If the engine were to be centred, I can understand why Anthony has such a small clearance for the Dave Taylor head steady post. On my one it is at least 12mm and after setting it up properly may be even more.

Now - does anyone have chapter and verse on the engine offset? I have never seen it written down and would appreciate some information.

Simon - this looks right up your street. It's even more worrying that to set up your engine you have said in another thread that you needed an adjustment of as much as ?"

Permalink

Simon, the manual says when checking the front iso push the engine to the right to take up the slack to get the measurment, that sounds daft to me and opposite to what I think you said, if I read you right? Tony

Permalink

Chris,

re engine offset, or more specificly wheel to frame alignment, Google "Worlds straightest Commando". This article has step by step instructions on Commando frame alignment. Due to production methods, factory tolerances and quality control (or lack of) there are no definitive frame dimensions for checking alignment. I assume the blueprints would have included +/- tolerances but what these were or if production frames were any where near I don't know. I don't think any two Commando frames are the same, or Featherbeds for that matter,

Simon.

Permalink

The frame lugs for the front and rear isolastic mounts are supposed to be central to the steering head. ie a centre line through the head spindle should coincide with a line drawn through the centre of the two pairs of isolastic lugs on the frame. Fact. The engine/gearbox plates are 3/16" across to the left of centre. the rear wheel rim is offset to the right to bring the rear wheel in line with the steering head. Seemples

Permalink

Alright Tony, checking for clearance is as per the manual.

Dave,

I have found that unfortunately you can't assume anything, especially when it comes to a Commando frame. Whatever the orientation of the isolastic brackets are supposed to be in relation to the frame centre line (I'd like to have a look at the drawings you've seen), without establishing a reference point for the frame centre line how do you know what the relationship of the brackets are? Where's the centre line on your frame? You also haven't taken into consideration that the iso. bracket bolt holes aren't perpendicular in two planes to the steering head. These errors result in the swinging arm spindle also not being square in two planes to the steering head and subsequently move the rear wheel further away from alignment. Without a frame centre line reference you can't accurately centre the rear wheel. Whilst in Northumbria at the National rally, I conducted some testing (on a private B road of course). With a barely legal rear tyre and part worn front tyre the bike ran straight with gusting winds and the speedo indicating 100mph. You mentioned your bike developed a weave at 75mph encountering side winds on the M6. How come? Your rear tyre also indicates lean angles not far off vertical. Are you sure your wheel to frame alignment is as it should be?

Simon.

Permalink

Previously simon_ratcliff wrote:

Alright Tony, checking for clearance is as per the manual.

Dave,

I have found that unfortunately you can't assume anything, especially when it comes to a Commando frame. Whatever the orientation of the isolastic brackets are supposed to be in relation to the frame centre line (I'd like to have a look at the drawings you've seen), without establishing a reference point for the frame centre line how do you know what the relationship of the brackets are? Where's the centre line on your frame? You also haven't taken into consideration that the iso. bracket bolt holes aren't perpendicular in two planes to the steering head. These errors result in the swinging arm spindle also not being square in two planes to the steering head and subsequently move the rear wheel further away from alignment. Without a frame centre line reference you can't accurately centre the rear wheel. Whilst in Northumbria at the National rally, I conducted some testing (on a private B road of course). With a barely legal rear tyre and part worn front tyre the bike ran straight with gusting winds and the speedo indicating 100mph. You mentioned your bike developed a weave at 75mph encountering side winds on the M6. How come? Your rear tyre also indicates lean angles not far off vertical. Are you sure your wheel to frame alignment is as it should be?

Simon.

Hi Simon, You have me mixed up with another Tony I think, I didn't mention anything about a weave on the M6. I read that article about the straightest commando, although very interesting and relevant , I have neither the money or more importantly the skill to attempt to bring my frame up to anything like that standard. All I can realistically do is set the isos as best I can and fit this new head steady. So, going back to what you said about leavering the engine over, it is away from the side you are adjusting, so if I'm on the right side adjusting the front I would push the engine away from me, is this right? Thanks again, cheers Tony.

Permalink

Hi Tony,

the M6 weaving I refered to was in reply to Dave Evans message. You're correct ref. to adjusting the front iso. For the rear I push on the rear wheel from the drive side to check clearance. One thing you can do is lock the rear iso after first removing the collars and ptfe washers from the front iso and check clearances between iso tube ends and inside front iso brackets to make sure the assemblies each side are the same width as the space available. Machine and shim as required. Best to do this before fitting the head steady. It helps to get the front and rear iso's somewhere near parallel. Obviously adjust to 0.006" clearance afterwards,

Simon.

Permalink

Previously simon_ratcliff wrote:

Hi Tony,

the M6 weaving I refered to was in reply to Dave Evans message. You're correct ref. to adjusting the front iso. For the rear I push on the rear wheel from the drive side to check clearance. One thing you can do is lock the rear iso after first removing the collars and ptfe washers from the front iso and check clearances between iso tube ends and inside front iso brackets to make sure the assemblies each side are the same width as the space available. Machine and shim as required. Best to do this before fitting the head steady. It helps to get the front and rear iso's somewhere near parallel. Obviously adjust to 0.006" clearance afterwards,

Simon.

Thanks Simon, I'll give that a go when I can, and let you know how it goes, cheers Tony.

Permalink

My M6 weave I put down to the standard issue of most of my weight being on the rear. In addition I notice that when the weave builds up and I removed one hand from the bars the weave reduces. I put that down to what is known in the flying world as PIO or pilot induced oscillation ie. the wind on my chest is creating an alternate pulling force on each side of the bars.

Permalink

So, nothing to do with wheel to frame alignment then. My unfaired bike was loaded similarly but doesn't display the symptoms you reported your bike suffers from. As I assume you were seated normally, then most of the weight distribrution would be as solo, unless you were carrying 14 stone of camping equipment. Also, adjusting shock absorber preload would compensate for any additional rear loading,

Simon.

Permalink

Hi Simon, I took off the front iso and measured as you sujested, what do I set the fixed collar to? Is it 6thou? Although that would give you 12thou movement! Sorry to be a nuisance but I can't find out anything about it In my manual. Thank, Tony.

Permalink

Should have said I took off the front iso and removed the collar and washer, put it back on the bike, with no head steady and the rear iso locked up, got my misses to sit on the bike with no centre stand then I checked the wheels for straightness, they where parallel but the front wheel was over to one side so, I put the bike on the side stand and checked the wheels again they were straight and parallel so I measured between the frame and bare iso without moving anything Is that ok to do it like that? There is 6mm difference one side to another!! Cheers Tony.

Permalink

Hi Tony,

I think the best way to check is support the bike on the lower frame rails so it is near enough vertical, with the rear wheel off the ground. Then with the rear iso locked up i.e zero clearance, rear iso bolt torqued up and the front iso refitted minus adjuster and fixed collar etc measure the gap between the front iso tube end and inside bracket on each side. Now measure the thickness of each assembly removed from the front iso and compare with the iso tube to bracket dimension. Note that the adjuster and fixed collar are different thicknesses so the iso to bracket gaps will not be equal.

Any difference between assemblies and gaps needs to be corrected by removing metal from an adjuster or collar by machining or adding metal with shims or spacers as required. Hope this is clear, the procedure is described in Worlds straightest Commando also,

Simon.

Permalink

Good point about the different thicknesses, I didn't think of that. What about my question on how you set the fixed collar ? Tony.

Permalink

Lock the collar against the tube and then insert the rubber assembly into the mounting tube, silicon grease helps, and push in until you have 0.003" clearance. A bit fiddly, but essential to get it right. You can pull it through a bit for fine adjustment using spacers and a nut on the other end of the threaded tube,

Simon.

Permalink

Sorry Tony, I'm confusing the issue. There's no need for you to insert the rubber assembly into the mounting tube if you haven't taken it out.

If the clearance between the fixed collar and thrust washer is greater than 0.003" then you can add shims underneath the mounting tube end cap. If the clearance is less then you can add shims between the fixed collar and threaded tube end. There's a grub screw which locks the collar to the tube, which then screws off. It will probably be quite tight due to corrosion. Alternatively move the rubbers/tube within the mounting tube - that's the fiddly bit.

Simon.

Permalink

Thanks Simon, I too off the collars and washers both sides and they came off easily, when I screw the fixed collar on it will lock the washer up, so that is why I want to know how much play to give it before I tighten up the grub screw? Cheers Tony.

Permalink

Tony,

just to clarify. If you want 0.006" total clearance then effectively each side is set to 0.003". The fixed collar is set at 0.003". When checking clearances on the bike the isolastic assembly is temporarily pushed over to one side to take up the 0.003" clearance, turn the adjustable collar until the gap you measure is 0.006" when the mounting bolt is torqued up, which should equate to 0.003" per side when the iso assembly returns to it's free position,

Simon.

Permalink

Tony, I have a DT head steady on mine. Which unscewed itself a couple of times. You may find you need to use a little threadlock on the rose joint coupling screws.

It was avery tight fit indeed on mine, no clearance at all for the upper frame member collar, but the important thing as I understand it is the parallelism of the actual arm that runs from the cykinder head assembly to the frame. That took me a while and some manipulation, but I eventually got there.

When it runs it seems to move a ridiculous amount at tickover, then you rev it and all movement seems to disappear!

I think it is now right, but I am not sure, and I can't tell you what it is like on the road as I can't get the damned clutch to work!!! It's sulking because I got the starter working :)

Good luck,

Jack

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans