Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Commando vibration

Forums

Having read a lot about isolastics and vibration I would like to know from some of the more experienced members if my 1972 Roadster's vibration is within "normal" limits.

Generally violentvibration isfelt in the handlebars and seat from approx 2500 to 3000rpm, where everyting smoothes out. Its worst in 3rd gear under light load, say in town, where vibration is bad enough to disturb the fillings in my teeth!

The bike is fitted with the adjustable isolastics, but before I start playing around with adjustments, I would like to know if I can expect any improvement? I assume that loosening the isolastics will improve vibration, by soaking up more of it, and the opposite will have the opposite effect. At the moment handling is excellent. Straight line stability is great, long fast corners, tight corners and breaking is equally flawless, so I wouldn't like to disturb any of these.

I would be greatful for any opinions?

Permalink

Basically you are right the tighter the isolastics the better the handling but more vibration,what head steady does your bike have?,if its the norvil type you will get more vibes but from your description it does sound excessive, regards nick

Permalink

Hi Tom,

I have an 850 MkIII but it is all pretty much the same. Once mine is much over tickover it is fairly smooth, has more of a shake than vibration. Once under way there is very little vibration at all. This is what I would expect.

Over the years I havetightenedthe isolastics a little too much on occasion and it did bring about vibration.

Adjust according to the book and it should be smooth.

I did fit a Dave Taylor head steady a while ago and this did generate sufficient vibration for me to take it off again. I will have another go one day when I have the time to see if it was just badly set up (by me!).

Regards

Tony

Permalink

There's something wrong somewhere Tom. Isolastics have to be bolted up pretty well solid before it becomes uncomfortable but it may depend on what you're used to.

Recent manufacture iso rubbers do seem to be harder.

It's worth checking to see that nothing is 'bridging' the isolastics. Did the previous owner do anything silly with crash bars ? Is the fuel tank contacting the head steady ? Footrest against the primary chaincase, that sort of thing.

If the isolatic tubes or caps are not square then false readings will result.

I'd be a bit concerned about vibration which appears to be gear ratio related rather than pure rpm as it may indicate that it comes from the transmission. If it is substantially less in top at the same rpm then it suggests that the cause may lie in the gearbox (in top gear, the input shaft is locked to the output sleeve gear so loadings are diferent).

Permalink

My 850 has always gone through a resonance at somewhere a little over tickover but that damps out very quickly as the revs increase and under normal riding conditions does not notice at all.

More significant was the degree of crank balance (this should start a load of comments!). As supplied, the machine did vibrate a bit more as it went faster. I had the crank balanced and was asked at what rpm I wanted it. I said 4000 rpm which worked very well, but produced a rougher spot at 2750. As I understand things, it's a parallel twin so to some extent you only ever move the imbalance around, you never get rid of it altogether. I am sure I will be put right if have not got that correct.

Tony Ripley and I have exchanged views on the Dave Taylor head steady before and we have very opposite experiences. Tony's did nothing to improve the situation whereas for me it did a good job and the Norvil type that preceded it went into a storage box where it still lies.

Lastly, I too have gone for slightly tighter than recommended Isolastics and found that this helped.

Permalink

Thanks for all the comments, they havegiven mefood for thoughts! The bad vibration spot is definitely rpm related, as mentioned 2500-3000rpm, but vibration is harsher in 3rd gear with a light load than 4th where load is heavier. I will proceed to check out the isolastics and any obvious faults likeparts touching where they shouldn't and perhaps chain tension.

My background is riding almost solely singlecylinderBritish iron, likeMatchless and AJS. They are a completely different ball game,much more sluggish and reluctant to rev,but they also have certain rpm bands wherevibrationismore pronounced than others. But I have never experienced such harsh vibration as the 2500-3000rpm band on the Commando. So I'm definitely on the hunt for some sort of explanation. After all a parallel twin is not that different, itsjust 2 pistons reaching TDC at the same time!

I forgot to mention in my opening post that the bike is fitted with a primary belt drive.But I don't see how that would induce vibration, rather the opposite. But of course the primary drive train is part of the whole drive line, so maybe worth looking at too. The clutch slips ever so slightly under heavy acceleration, but it doesn't coincide with the vibration band.

Anyways thanks for all your suggestions, they all seem to be relevant to my problem, so I will start with the obvious things like isolastics and head steady and see where that gets me.

Apart from this minor issue, I really enjoy the power, torque and smoothness, apart from the offending rpm band, of the Commando. And then there is looks! The Commando simply is one of the best looking British motorcycles ever built. When I was a teenager I used to have several Commando posters in my room, chaning them out whenever a new model or colour was released.

Permalink

Previously wrote:

There's something wrong somewhere Tom. Isolastics have to be bolted up pretty well solid before it becomes uncomfortable but it may depend on what you're used to.

Recent manufacture iso rubbers do seem to be harder.

It's worth checking to see that nothing is 'bridging' the isolastics. Did the previous owner do anything silly with crash bars ? Is the fuel tank contacting the head steady ? Footrest against the primary chaincase, that sort of thing.

If the isolatic tubes or caps are not square then false readings will result.

I'd be a bit concerned about vibration which appears to be gear ratio related rather than pure rpm as it may indicate that it comes from the transmission. If it is substantially less in top at the same rpm then it suggests that the cause may lie in the gearbox (in top gear, the input shaft is locked to the output sleeve gear so loadings are diferent).

A very valid point! Under light load in 3rd gear there is a slight rumble, that seems to come from the gearbox. It doesn't seem to coincide with the vibration band though, but maybe yet another thing to investigate. Does the Commando gearbox have a general problem wiht bearings or axles that is worth checking? I know the AMC gearbox from my Matchless, so I wouldn't betoo disturbedfacing a stripdown. I feel a very systematic approach is necessary to corner this problem, so as stated elsewhere I will start with the obvious and easy things to check.

Permalink

A rumble from the gearbox doesn't sound good. The achilles heel of this box was the layshaft bearing. This can now be replaced with a superblend roller bearing from Andover Norton.

I have read this thread with interest as I have a 1972, 750 which I've owned for 30 years this year. I rebuilt the engine and gearbox a year ago and while it was apart I decided to have the crank balanced. The bike didn't have a nasty vibration, but would definitely have a good shake at 5000 plus revs. I had it balanced for 4-5000 revs as I like to open it up, especially when keeping up with mates on modern bikes. I'm regretting having this done now as I have a tingly vibration at 2500-3000 revs that makes my hands go numb and pins and needle in the lower region. This might be nice at another time, but not when you can't feel a thing when riding your bike.

I have chatted to the engineering firm that did the work and they are very surprised about this as it was dynamically balanced and they have done many Commandos. I was asked if I had done anything else to the engine and I said yes, I've put an electronic ignition on it. I was told to check my timing and retard it a fraction to see if this makes a difference. It was a bit advanced so I knocked it back a bitand yes it worked. It didn't cure the vibration but it's a bit better. So try retarding your timing a degree and see if it works for you.

I now realise that my Commando was set up really well for most riding conditions, from the factory. My need for speed and search to "improve" the bike has created this problem. The big shake was a lot better than a tingly vibration, but now I have to live with it.

Permalink

Previously wrote:

A rumble from the gearbox doesn't sound good. The achilles heel of this box was the layshaft bearing. This can now be replaced with a superblend roller bearing from Andover Norton.

I have read this thread with interest as I have a 1972, 750 which I've owned for 30 years this year. I rebuilt the engine and gearbox a year ago and while it was apart I decided to have the crank balanced. The bike didn't have a nasty vibration, but would definitely have a good shake at 5000 plus revs. I had it balanced for 4-5000 revs as I like to open it up, especially when keeping up with mates on modern bikes. I'm regretting having this done now as I have a tingly vibration at 2500-3000 revs that makes my hands go numb and pins and needle in the lower region. This might be nice at another time, but not when you can't feel a thing when riding your bike.

I have chatted to the engineering firm that did the work and they are very surprised about this as it was dynamically balanced and they have done many Commandos. I was asked if I had done anything else to the engine and I said yes, I've put an electronic ignition on it. I was told to check my timing and retard it a fraction to see if this makes a difference. It was a bit advanced so I knocked it back a bitand yes it worked. It didn't cure the vibration but it's a bit better. So try retarding your timing a degree and see if it works for you.

I now realise that my Commando was set up really well for most riding conditions, from the factory. My need for speed and search to "improve" the bike has created this problem. The big shake was a lot better than a tingly vibration, but now I have to live with it.

Thanks for your input. My bike is still fitted with the old mechanical ignition, so I expect some smoothness to be gained when the Pazon electronic unithas been fitted. Apart from ignition, carb balancing/adjustment could be something to look into. Not for me though, since I have the SU conversion fitted. Very smooth and precise delivery of fuel to engine, but a little on the lean side until I find an airfilter that fits. It will keep the plugs clean and grey/white even when riding around in town.

Sorry to hear about your findings regarding crank balancing. You could look into changing the gearing, a less invasive procedure than having the crank rebalanced. I realize it would only move vibration, but maybe that is just what is required. Did you fit new pistons? If so, did you weigh them to check for differences? Pattern pistons vary greatly in quality and weight, if not checked they could alone be responsible for your problem. The same with conrods. But I guess your engineering firm should be familiar with that.

Permalink

Previously wrote:

Having read a lot about isolastics and vibration I would like to know from some of the more experienced members if my 1972 Roadster's vibration is within "normal" limits.

Hello. Try to determine the size of the gap to start with; use a long bar to move the engine over and insert a feeler blade. Always adjust the isolastics when the machine is on the sidestand.

I find that a good section of road where you can accelerate up to about 70mph is essential as a testing area for isolastics. Start in a layby and ride about half a mile to reach the target speed. Determine where the vibration is worse in top gear. Back to the layby. Adjust the front isolastic with the large bar and socket and reach 6 thou. Tighten up with a torque wrench. Go for the ride. Back to the layby. Open the clearance out to about 8 thou, tightenand try another ride. Aim for top gear again. Back to the layby. Open up to about 10 thou and tighten etc. Another ride. Somewhere here will produce a sweet spot; on my machine [they are all different] the worst patch is about 2,200 to 2,500. From there on it's really smooth.At 5,000 it's unbelievable. If it's about right then when you are sitting on the machine the front mudguard should be moving up and down regularly. When you apply the front brake the up and down movement should stop.

Good Luck!

Colin Cheney, somewhere in England.

Generally violentvibration isfelt in the handlebars and seat from approx 2500 to 3000rpm, where everyting smoothes out. Its worst in 3rd gear under light load, say in town, where vibration is bad enough to disturb the fillings in my teeth!

The bike is fitted with the adjustable isolastics, but before I start playing around with adjustments, I would like to know if I can expect any improvement? I assume that loosening the isolastics will improve vibration, by soaking up more of it, and the opposite will have the opposite effect. At the moment handling is excellent. Straight line stability is great, long fast corners, tight corners and breaking is equally flawless, so I wouldn't like to disturb any of these.

I would be greatful for any opinions?

Permalink

Seems a bit high. My 750 was balanced at 63% with pistons androds weighed and matched etc. It was quite poor from side to side and a fair bit of material was removed from one side. It didn't make a huge difference to the high frequency vibes from 4200 rpm. Mine is rough at 1800-2400, smooths out and then a tingle/roughness comes through the footrests from 4200 appx. If I depress the gear lever (in top) I can feelvery coarse vibes. At the same time putting a gloved hand on the head/barrels it feels pretty good. Gear shafts are straight, belt drive in place, replaced bearings. I also have a solid head steady of my own make (see pic) and it works well but made no difference to vibes. ISO's are set at 10 thou, any less and HF vibes are much worse. Even went to the trouble of squaring up ISO tubes and getting front and rear cradle offset the same (was 60 thou more on front than rear, pointing the whole assy left). That cured weaving at speed.

http://i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp322/keith1069/NewHeadSteady014.jpg

Permalink

I seems to me that most of the contributors to this thread have a patch of vibration, from anywhere between just over idle and up to 2500-3000 rpm. This actually corresponds to my own experience. So that puts my mind to rest about the condition of the engine, which is otherwise exemplary oiltight and tidy overall. I have done the same test as mentioned by Colin, holding my hand on the cylinders, to feel vibration on the go. And there a just perceptible increase in vibration in the offending rpm range, 2500-3000. But once 3000rpm is passed everything smoothes out nicely, and I haven't detected any other rev range with bad vibration, up to over 5000rpm. So overall I am more confident that my enginge is within the "normal" range.

I have now started playing with the isolastics, but so far I haven't been able to dertermine a better adjustment. But I will need to be more systematic as suggested by Colin Cheney, and arrange a test day on my local "playground", gettinga better feel for it.

Permalink

The bike has had Powermax pistons fitted from before I owned it, The pistons, rings, gudgeon pins, circlips, conrods, shells, conrod nuts and bolts were all weighed and matched with each other. Then weights of this amount put on the bigend journals. Not forgetting to add the weight of the oil that's inside the journals and flywheel. The crank is spun and balanced like a car wheel. I'm sure the company did a good job.

I have a 23 toothed gearbox sprocket fitted, and the bike flies. It could even pull another gear as it revs so well in top. There is no shaking at high revs, just a tingle through the footrests. It still vibrates less than my mates BSA A65 so I should stop moaning about it really. 2500-3000 is about 40-50mph, and you forget how often you ride at these speeds, I can't go flat out everywhere. It's just different than it was and not necessarily better.

Permalink

The bike has had Powermax pistons fitted from before I owned it, The pistons, rings, gudgeon pins, circlips, conrods, shells, conrod nuts and bolts were all weighed and matched with each other. Then weights of this amount put on the bigend journals. Not forgetting to add the weight of the oil that's inside the journals and flywheel. The crank is spun and balanced like a car wheel. I'm sure the company did a good job.

I have a 23 toothed gearbox sprocket fitted, and the bike flies. It could even pull another gear as it revs so well in top. There is no shaking at high revs, just a tingle through the footrests. It still vibrates less than my mates BSA A65 so I should stop moaning about it really. 2500-3000 is about 40-50mph, and you forget how often you ride at these speeds, I can't go flat out everywhere. It's just different than it was and not necessarily better.

Permalink

Just add my tupence worth,

I'm on my third Commando, and this one shook something awfull, at low revs

Did Iso's, rebuilt Iso's checked head steady etc etc

So bad I was dreading something was serously wrong, but the engine n gearbox are really quiet.

It's a bit of a rolling renovation and the next thing on my list was to replace the carbs (Knackered Slides)

After fitting the new ones with the same jetting ect I notice remarkably better tickover and bottom end responce but -

The vibrationhad goteven worse about 2000 - 3000 RPM

This got me thinking,

I dropped the needles to centre position (It's MKIIa with plastic airbox,long needles n cutaway jet bodies)

The difference after droping the needles and resetting tick over mixtures is amazing, so smooth

So its allways worth looking at other reasons for symptoms as well

GP

Permalink

Previously wrote:

Just add my tupence worth,

I'm on my third Commando, and this one shook something awfull, at low revs

Did Iso's, rebuilt Iso's checked head steady etc etc

So bad I was dreading something was serously wrong, but the engine n gearbox are really quiet.

It's a bit of a rolling renovation and the next thing on my list was to replace the carbs (Knackered Slides)

After fitting the new ones with the same jetting ect I notice remarkably better tickover and bottom end responce but -

The vibrationhad goteven worse about 2000 - 3000 RPM

This got me thinking,

I dropped the needles to centre position (It's MKIIa with plastic airbox,long needles n cutaway jet bodies)

The difference after droping the needles and resetting tick over mixtures is amazing, so smooth

So its allways worth looking at other reasons for symptoms as well

GP

Thanks for the heads up on this one, because after playing around with the adjustable isolastics, I am basically back to square one, with a rough patch of vibration from 2300-2800 rpm. Rest of rev range is fine. Next step would be ignition and carburation. My Commando is fitted with the SU carb conversion, which actually works really well. Starts 1 or 2 kick, but choke always needed. Runs a bit lean, but this will probably be balanced out a bit when I have fittedan airfilter. It could be, as you say,that the engine is starved of fuel in that particular rev range, on the other handit responds welltoopening the throttle, sooo..... But its quite an easy thing to try out, soI will report later.

Now that we're at it, is there any adjustment necessary/possible on the head steady, standard setup,apart from tightening it up properly?

Permalink

I worked out (lastweek on the road) that if you use the gears to ensure that you keep the rev's at the right place, it isn't really too much of a problem!

Don't labour it, don't over rev it.

However to be fair, I have just adjusted the isolastics on mine, and I did fit a Dave Taylor head steady, which is nothing short of excellent and not too much of a faff to do.

Erm, it also has new brass slide Amals, new Pazon ignition, new stator (uprated), new "power box"; partial rewire (someone had been at the loom with a knife and fork); clutch rebuild (after a "oooo, let's put a 750 clutchwith an extra plain plate,into an 850", bodge...) which I am expecting to have to rebuildagain very soon with at least a proper thickness pressure plate - after proving it just isn't agoodsolution; a starterrebuildwith new brushes, I even re-oiled the oilites!(it actually works a treat when warm and just needs a little helpwith cold gloopy oil); new sprag clutch, crank and starter gear cogs, capacitor (these are service items you know - if you have neverchangedyours do it now. Electrolytic cap's do go dry over time and do not work. You can get a good cheap equivalent from CPC.), and a few other things.

I must have had "saw you coming", on my forehead when I bought it last year!

But some of this work mayexplainits apparent enginely calmness. Or not. I just don't know...but I do know it pulls like a train, steersaccuratelyand tracks like something that tracks very well, and then took some "watch me corner" drugs to make sure it did it better.

Oooops, oh well; back to the ward

Fun times!

Jack

Permalink

Previously wrote:

I worked out (lastweek on the road) that if you use the gears to ensure that you keep the rev's at the right place, it isn't really too much of a problem!

Don't labour it, don't over rev it.

However to be fair, I have just adjusted the isolastics on mine, and I did fit a Dave Taylor head steady, which is nothing short of excellent and not too much of a faff to do...

Jack

You're right about keeping the engine out ofthe offending rev range, the only problem is that I often end up right there at 2500rpmin town,withslow traffic at around 30mph. If I shift down from 4th to 3rdrevs rise to 3000rpm, where everything smoothes out, but rpms seem a tad high for just cruising. If at 30mph I shift to 4th rpms drop to 2000, which the engine doesn't really mind, but torque at hand is minimal. I was thinking aboutgoing up one tooth onthe gearbox sprocket. The engine should pull it without problems, and it would move vibration away from town speeds. I will consider that at next chain change.

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans