Skip to main content
000000 000003 000006 000009 000012 000015 000018 000021 000024 000027 000030 000033 000036 000039 000042 000045 000048 000051 000054 000057 000060 000063 000066 000069 000072 000075 000078 000081 000084 000087 000090 000093 000096 000099 000102 000105 000108 000111 000114 000117 000120 000123 000126 000129 000132 000135 000138 000141 000144 000147 000150 000153 000156 000159 000162 000165 000168 000171 000174 000177 000180 000183 000186 000189 000192 000195 000198 000201 000204 000207 000210 000213 000216 000219 000222 000225 000228 000231 000234 000237 000240 000243 000246 000249 000252 000255 000258 000261 000264 000267 000270 000273 000276 000279 000282 000285 000288 000291 000294 000297 000300 000303 000306 000309 000312 000318 000321 000324 000327 000330 000333 000336 000339 000342 000345 000348 000351 000354 000357 000360 000363 000366 000369 000372 000375 000378 000381 000384 000387 000390 000393 000396 000399 000402 000405 000408 000411 000414 000417 000420 000423 000426 000429 000432 000435 000438 000441 000444 000447 000450 000453 000456 000459 000462 000465 000468 000471 000474 000477 000480 000483 000486 000489 000492 000495 000498 000501 000504 000507 000510 000513 000516 000519 000522 000525 000528 000531 000534 000537 000540 000543 000546 000549 000552 000555 000558 000561 000564 000567 000570 000573 000576 000579 000582 000585 000588 000591 000594 000597 000600 000603 000606 000609 000612 000615 000618 000621 000624 000627 000630 000633 000636 000639 000642 000645 000648 000651 000654 000657 000660 000663 000666 000669 000672 000675 000678 000681 000684 000687 000690 000693 000696 000699 000702 000705 000708 000711 000714 000717 000720 000723 000726 000729 000732 000735 000738 000741 000744 000747 000750 000753 000756 000759 000762 000765 000768 000771 000774 000777 000780 000783 000786 000789 000792 000795 000798 000801 000804 000807 000810 000813 000816 000819 000822 000825 000828 000831 000834 000837 000840 000843 000846 000849 000852 000855 000858 000861 000864 000867 000870 000873 000876 000879 000882
English French German Italian Spanish

Slimline tank rear mounting hook

Forums

Hi. I have two slimline frame petrol tanks, both still in the original grey/silver paint. The only difference between the two is that on one of them the rear mounting ‘hook’ (for the rubber band) is flush with the rear of the tank - you can’t see any evidence of a join between the two surfaces. However, on the other tank, the hook is mounted onto a square plate which is itself tack welded in four places to the back of the tank. At first I thought that someone had cut off the hook for some reason and then re-attached it at a later date, but on looking through a Norton book (one of Roy Bacon’s) I found a photo of a tank that had the welded plate/hook on it. I thought it might be my tank, but it can’t be because the welds are in different places. So does anybody know the story behind the difference in tank mounting methods? I’m assuming that one is later than the other but I’m only guessing.

Thanks

Regards

Tony

Permalink

Hi... So have I actually come up with a question that nobody on the Forum can answer? That’s got to be worth a prize - how about a brand new Commando? Well, it was worth a try :-)

Regards

Tony

Hello there is only one place for the rear mounting hook that's in mid ships next to the bottom of the tank and fastened by a rubber O ring band     and was gas welded on so you need to find someone in your Ares that can gas weld    as good as me.  Yours  Anna j

 

Permalink

Tanks made in the Norton factory  could be different to those made at Woolwich.  Which side of the tanks are the filler caps on?.

Hello mounting hooks should be the same right to the Mercury 650 why would they change something that cheap and easy to fit. Yours. Anna j

Permalink

No idea Anna, but they certainly changed things for no apparent reason. Threads on steering columns, threads on bearing rings finishes on fixings,etc.

Hello Robert  I  would not know ether  AS I do not venture beyond Bracebridge street  Norton's  and that enough for me for now  Your problem to solve   your anna j

Permalink

Thanks everyone.

Robert, you might be onto something - the filler caps are indeed on opposite sides - I’m sure that indicates something, but I don’t know what it is - different years/factories maybe?

The dimensions of the two tanks are identical.

I’ve attached photos showing the filler caps and the different hooks.

Thanks again.

Tony

Permalink

My -68 650SS had this tank when I bought it. Cap on the right side. It has been repaired. Seems not uncommon that they start to leak. My guess is that the square piece with hook could be obtained from somewhere for repairs.

 

Attachments
Permalink

My slimline tank which I am sure is original fitting has the filler cap on the near side and the loop is part of a square plate, as per photo.

 

slimline tank

Attachments
Permalink

Hi Tony

Here are pics of my Slimline featherbed 1960 Manxman tank that was just chemically dipped.  It has the square plate just like Colin's above and filler cap on the left-hand side (sitting on the bike).  Cheers, Mike

Manxman rear mounting plate
Manxman rear mounting plate

 

Side view of rear Manxman mounting plate
Side view of rear mounting plate

 

Side view of tank and filler cap
Side view of tank and filler cap (don't look at the dent!)

 

Permalink

My understanding is that the earlier Bracebridge tanks had the filler on the left.(pre 63?)  Later Woolwich tanks seem to have them on the right. Possibly to resist leaks and aid filling when on the side stand?. All guesswork but it would appear that you have spotted yet another Woolwich anomaly re the bracket fixing ,which would seem to be a cheaper backward step as it concentrates the stresses in a smaller area. That Manxman tank of Mike's looks to be very different in construction and shape to the UK slimline tanks.At first sight one would assume it had been heavily cut about for a repair,or more likely it was  handmade (like the silencers) in a prototype way ,in expectation that the big run would get a proper pressing tool by Shelleys?. Fun this guesswork isn't it!!.

Permalink

While on the subject of odd tank details ,I was looking through some photos of early De-luxe slimlines( sad old git) and found a Factory shot (Bacons 1981 Osprey Twins page 43) that clearly has many clues that it was  a well used  prototype.  One being Mazack tank badges that have different fixings and shape like a lightweight and it also has no tickler slot in the sidepanel that production bikes have.

Permalink

Hi Mike, Robert,

Thanks for taking the time to get involved with this. It’s strange that Mike’s tank and Colin’s tank have the welded on hook plate but the filler neck is on the left. My tank with the welded on hook has the filler on the right - another weird situation.

I’m edging towards using my tank that has the right-hand filler as I think it will be better because I want to use a side-stand. I’m worried that if I have a left-hand filler and the tank has been filled to the brim while it’s on the centre-stand it will overflow when the bike is put in the side-stand. Does that sound like a reasonable assumption?

Thanks again

Regards

Tony

Permalink

A side stand is a really usefull device, particularly as one gets old  and less athletic , I managed perfectly well up to the age of 70 without.   Could not manage now!, fit one while you can.

 

Norton Owners Club Website by White-Hot Design

Privacy Policy