Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Steering head bearings

Forums

Hello Again, it's been a while!

My '73 750 Commando is starting to come along and I'm assembling finished parts into something now resembling a motorcycle.

I've noticed a weird thing with the forks. 

Every thing feels fine until I drop the rolling chassis off the stand and weight the bike a bit by straddling the frame. I then get a series of clunks coming through the bars when I move them from lock to lock, much as you would expect to feel from badly notched bearings that are over tightened. These are the sealed ball bearing type with a spacer tube.

It's been apart and back together again at least 6 times and still the same thing.

So far I have changed the already new bearings for more new ones, thinking that I damaged them putting them in.. Still the same

I'm using the factory manual method of fitting them and only driving the outer race when inserting everything is by the book.

I've checked the length of the spacer tube, which is a little short @ 5 1/16" or 128mm. It should be 5 3/32" or 129 but it is still longer than the space between the bearing recesses.

I have checked the ends for square and carefully corrected one end without taking off and measurable metal. 

I can't believe the clunking is in the bearings, it feels like the whole front end twangs when it goes over the "bumps" I've checked the new front wheel bearings and the sliders on the new stanchions and bushes.. No play. The newly built wheel is all tight on the spokes and can't be made to move.

I've tried with the Iso-lastics racked up tight and also correctly adjusted. I've tried loosening everything, trying it loose and re-tightening.. Still the same whatever.

I've tried putting the front wheel on a carrier bag in case the tyre was twisting and transmitting something into the forks... The rear wheel is done up tight.

I've had the front axle nut and pinch bolt loose tight and everything in between. I've forced the legs apart and pinched them up and forced them together as well.. Still the same whatever.

It's the same with the stem nut off, done up to and estimated 15 ft/lbs or racked up tight.

I've had the top bearing shy of the tube, kissing the tube and tapped lightly onto the tube.. Still no dice.

It's not like it's the first set of head bearings I've fitted, I've been at this game for nearly 50 years with various marques, although it's the first time I've come across this arrangement.. Thought it looked like a fool proof method!!!

Any ideas greatly received..... Please

Permalink

Lock stop  plate  (if you have one)  loose ?.   I expect you are loosening  the pinch bolts and levering the yokes enough to free the staunchions  while doing adjustments. . Steering lock catching?.

Permalink

Thank you Robert and John for taking the time to think about this.

I don't have a lock stop plate, just lugs on the bottom yoke and a welded on lug in the centre of the steering head tube.

I've been just nipping up the stem nut before inserting the stanchions, then pulling those up with the top nuts so it's pretty much there. It all goes together very smoothly (I've had enough practice now!!) with the stanchions greased and the pinch bolts loose. I don't nip those up until everything is properly in place.. You have to do the stem nut up to draw the bottom yoke into place to capture the headlamp lugs, but it's just finger tight at this stage, or just hand tight with a box spanner with no tommy bar.

Normally I would bounce the forks with the front brake firmly on at this stage to settle everything, but I am a bit reluctant to put fluid in the line just yet until I sort out the proper handlebars. Maybe I should bleed it up and try that anyway.

On the stand with a bit of weight on the seat rails the forks glide from side to side as smooth as a baby's. with the wheel in contact with the ground it moves the freshly powder coated stand feet on my chipboard floor, hence why I tightened up the Iso's in case there was an issue there.

I've been all round the top and bottom yokes with an inspection lamp and feeler gauges to check there is clearance. I did find a witness where the dust cover had cut a groove in the coating on the weld of the steering lock plate. (The lockable one at the top) I ground this out and achieved clearance.. There is no contact between the yokes and frame except via the bearings.

Could do with another straw to clutch!

Permalink

Obviously something is binding somewhere and if it's not the bearings I would maybe suspect the dust cap.

If it were mine, I'd strip out the fork legs and try the top and bottom yokes on their own - lose at first and then progressively tightening things up.  There should be no notchiness whatsoever.

Permalink

Thanks Simon, I was actually referring to the brake fluid. The forks have their oil in them and I can feel no play with the stanchions in a vice, leaning on the legs in all directions.

I had no inspiration to go in the shed last night, but I think the only way forward is to fill the brake, give the forks a good pounding on the brake and then tighten everything up. That's always been standard practice for me with anything front end related anyway.

What I don't get is that there's nothing to adjust on this set up. The top and bottom inner races can only be tightened between the yokes and spacer and that's that. The bottom bearing taps in to the bottom shoulder in the steering head tube. The only thing that kind of has to position itself is the top outer race, there is no mechanical location for that other than the bore of the steering head tube, it relies on being tapped into position when it is knocked down onto the spacer, nothing can really effect it once its in place.. I'm thinking as I type that maybe I need to make a "puller" to firmly clamp the two bearings onto the spacer tube before the stem goes in?

Weird though that this only surfaces when the weight is on the front wheel, otherwise the action is ultra smooth.

Thanks for telling me there should be no notchiness Bob. (If that is a word?)

Permalink

The top bearing is seated down into the housing, this housing is just deep enough to take the bearing so easy to see if its seated full or not. Bottom housing is overlong, the bottom bearings position is set by the spacer tube, as the steering stem has a coarse thread its possible its not acting as a puller leaving the bottom bearing out of position so using a puller prior to inserting the stem makes sense. The spacer tube being undersize may also be an issue but not sure how other than the bottom yoke fouling the headstock.

Permalink

Have you got washer NM.17429 (067685) under the top dust cover.

I accidentally fitted this on top of the dust cover and had notchiness as the dust cover scrapes the tube. I felt very stupid!

 

 

Permalink

... model have the later type journal bearings rather than cup and cone? If so perhaps the central spacer is the wrong length? It should be long enough so that the top bearing outer isn't quite fully home - the weight of the bike should ensure that the bottom bearing is fully home.

Permalink

Thank you for engaging with this chaps. I think we might be getting a bit closer now?

I'm going to reply in full to the last posts at lunch time when I have a bit more time and I'm also going to refer back to the factory manual for the n-th time and check the other two manuals I have as well. Cheers.

Permalink

You had me going there John, by saying the top bearing is pushed home first. That's counter intuitive to me as I would have thought the bottom bearing needs to be up against the end of the housing to take the weight of the bike. Checking the factory manual confirms that it's the bottom bearing that goes in first up to the hilt as it were. The Haynes manual doesn't have anything to say about it, but it does advocate the brake on and bouncing that I should really be doing next.

Steve don't feel stupid for putting the washer on top of the dust cap. The manual says "Place the the top dust cover and washer over the top steering head bearing." Which does imply the order?. But goes on, "Note that the washer fits below the cover". Why not just say fit the washer then the cover?? A bit too late to edit I guess!

So yes my washer is in the right place.

Ian, yes sealed 2rs bearings with spacer. Mine is a mm or 1/32" shorter than spec'ed, but it is still longer than the distance between the bearing housings. The bottom bearing is home and I struggle to know exactly what is meant in the manual by abutting the bearing against the spacer tube. I've had it with the tube still moveable but with the bearing in contact, a bit looser and also driven onto the tube to the extent that it will turn both inner races with the tube turning between. I'm only tapping the outer race at this point. maybe I should be tapping the inner race at the final stage to knock it onto the tube?

I don't believe that the stem nut can draw up the assembly effectively as John noted that the thread is rather coarse. It seems to just make contact and stop rather that continue to tighten. In any case it's rather optimistic to expect the outer race to move when the inner is drawn up with the stem nut, so unless that bearing is in the correct position when installed all the stem nut is doing is pulling the races out of line.. Isn't it?

Why is the tube longer than the distance between the housings? That doesn't make sense to me. Surely the tube should be spot on the same as the housings so every thing fits in line?

I'll get the brake working tonight and give it a good bounce tightening from the top down. If that doesn't work, I might take it down to Cromer and see if it bounces when I push it over the cliff.

Permalink

This is a 73 frame, the stem is part of the top yoke not the bottom yoke, consequently after the top yoke is fitted to the bearings the stem nut ends up below the bottom yoke and pulls the bottom yoke upwards over the stem bottom end when screwed on.

https://andover-norton.co.uk/en/shop-drawing/225/roadholder-front-forks-steering-lock-steering-head-bearings

Both top and bottom bearings are 15mm thick.

The top housing on three 72 to 75 frames is 15,2 to 15.55mm depth.

Bottom housing on same frames is between 18 to 19mm depth.

Every 72 onwards frame I have seen the top bearings are always flush or just below the headstock top lip. I know the instructions tell you to drive the bottom bearing fully into its housing but this does not match any of this type of front end I have disassembled. The bottom bearings I have taken out have always below the top of the housing.

 

Permalink

Well! As I said that is counter intuitive to my way of thinking and also the manual, but if you say that is the way it is then I will give it a try. Hey ho, what's another front end pull down at the end of the day? I'm quite practiced now. 

That might actually load the bearings the way I want them to go, as bringing the bottom bearing up against the tube should raise the top inner and load it against the outer upwards and the same for the bottom too if I give the final tap on the bottom inner. So there should be equal load bearing on both bearings. All this is subject to the bearings being square of course, which apart from my checks is a bit pot luck really.

It will rob the dust cover of a little more clearance though and that leads me to think that it has never been that low before in this bike as there are no previous witnesses, but then I might just have to get another spacer tube if this doesn't work out.

Looking at the link you posted to the parts illustration,. (the link was not live btw, but I worked out what it was.) It occurred to me that I might possibly have a mixture of 750 and 850 angled yokes. I assume if that was the case that I would not be able to assemble the stanchions in? At the moment they slide up beautifully and centre in the tapers perfectly.

Permalink

If you had a mix of yokes the the stanchions would not fit, for a 750 neither yoke should have a raised ANG cast into the underside, only 850s have the ANG. The stanchions are angled 1 degree in the 850 yokes

The manual goes on after the bearing fit to tell you to fit the stem and top yoke with a final application of blows to seat it fully, done hard enough this would move both top and bottom bearings down but at risk of the balls damaging their tracks.

Permalink

Neither of my yokes have a "ANG" cast in, so I'm safe there. Cheers.

I've got the brake bled and given the front end a good pounding, I've done the sequential tightening and things are a little better. I can eliminate the clunking lock to lock by pushing the forks down hard with the brake on and leaning on the bars, but it comes back when the pressure comes off even just a little.

I think I've cocked up the sequential tightening a bit as the headlamp lugs have come loose a bit.

I nipped the bottom yokes up on the stanchions first and not the stem. I think one final session settling the yokes down and then dealing with the stanchions again should get it sorted, but what a palava!!

Thanks for your help John, I'll update again tomorrow eve.

You should be safe under the Cromer cliffs for the time being.. :-)

Permalink

" Why is the tube longer than the distance between the housings? That doesn't make sense to me. Surely the tube should be spot on the same as the housings so every thing fits in line? "

It's because manufacturing tolerances can't guarantee that level of accuracy. So the tube needs to be slightly longer to ensure that the bearings aren't being overloaded. It's the same with the spacer in the hubs which is designed to tighten up on the inners while the outer on the end which isn't positively located is free to find its own level. A result of this is that often the wheel is hard to turn on first assembly until the "free" outer has had the chance to align itself.

Permalink

 A result of this is that often the wheel is hard to turn on first assembly until the "free" outer has had the chance to align itself.

 

Just had this on a crinkle hub, last action was to install the axle and give it a sharp clout with a rubber mallet on the opposite end from the last bearing fitted and checking the axle was free to turn. I also noted that on modern hubs the lock ring is no longer fitted to the datum bearing, its retained purely by its interference fit, so the Norton headstock with the top ball bearing and no lock ring must have been an early example of what is now accepted as normal.

Permalink

.. that with the steering head situation virtually all the load is upwards due to the weight of the bike pushing the outer races down. The only exception would be when doing wheelies but even then the force in the opposite direction would be minimal (and would be reversed on landing).

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans