Hi, 1953 model 7 rod length, I need the centre eye to centre eye measurement to make sure I am using the correct rods. If anyone has this information it would be appreciated.
Many thanks - Tony, Vancouver, B.C.
I think they will be the s…
- Log in to post comments
Previously robert_tuck wro…
Previously robert_tuck wrote:
I think they will be the same as later 88 and 99 rods, whatever they are! I have a spare 99 rod somewhere if no one else comes up with it.
Hi Robert, thanks for the reply. According to the book the big end on the 500 is 1.500 and on 600/650 1.75, so wouldn't the rod lengths between 88 and 99/ss be different? Perhaps someone could measure an 88 rod length for comparison. On the 7 rods i have mid eye to eye is 6". thanks all.
- Log in to post comments
The 500 and 600 had the sa…
The 500 and 600 had the same rod with 1.5 big ends , the 650/750 had 1.75 big ends.Your book is rubbish!!, Norton did make a few specials for Works racers. There has been talk of perhaps a mystical Nomad with !.75 crank ,But no one has one that I have heard of. No reason you can't have one made, send me 4000 Quid !!. The 600 got its extra capacity from a crank with a bigger throw and bigger Barrel.. The 650 /750 rods wont fit a 7 . The 650/750 Rods with crank will fit in 7 cases if you weld extra room in there for the bigger crank throw. Are you very brave??. A 99/77 crank /rods/barrel set will fit your cases. Simples!!. Dynamo and alternator cranks are different to each other.
- Log in to post comments
For the idly curious, a BS…
For the idly curious, a BSA A7 rod will fit an 88 or 99.
- Log in to post comments
He is confused enough as i…
He is confused enough as it is Gordon. Don't mention your 750 model 99.
- Log in to post comments
For the idly curious, are…
For the idly curious, are new A7 rods availiable?, are they better than old Norton Rods?.(they do appear to be made from the same forging/stamping).
- Log in to post comments
Many thanks for all the in…
Many thanks for all the input which will be helpful to the Model 7 build. As I have discovered already some of the info in the restoration books we use is suspect. One example is 35 foot pounds torque on crankshaft bolts in the 1974 edition of the Norton Workshop manual by D.J. Rabone, amended in the 1990 edition of the same book to 25 foot pounds. This is also the book which references the 7/88 and 99/650 big end diameters I mentioned. Now I am a wiser man!
- Log in to post comments
Hi Robert, many thanks, mi…
Hi Robert, many thanks, mine are the correct length.
- Log in to post comments
Possibly a good place to r…
Possibly a good place to remind anyone going inside a Norton twin engine for the first time... Crankshaft bolt torque is listed at 35 lb.ft. in Haynes also... And should be 25 as noted above.
- Log in to post comments
I think they will be the same as later 88 and 99 rods, whatever they are! I have a spare 99 rod somewhere if no one else comes up with it.