Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Belt drive

Forums

I'm now fitting a Mick Hemmings belt drive to my 1955 ES2. (laydown box) I've read up as much as I can find on the subject. All OK until I get to clutch actuation. There is not enough cable movement to properly release the clutch. The rod moves enough, and it would be OK with the std clutch, but the diaphragm spring used on the belt drive assembly, whilst still being actuated from the centre, only produces about 1mm of lift or less at the point of contact with the first clutch plate, which is about 20mm from the outer diameter of the plate.

Anyone out there come across this problem and solved it?

Duncan.

Permalink

Hi Duncan, not altogether sure what's happening with your setup, but I have fitted a Hemmings belt drive to my ES2, exactly like yours then. My problems were with not enough space in the case to allow the clutch to lift without touching the inside, nothing like what you are experiencing. However, you do know that you don't need the mushroom shaped clutch lifter? That would give you some more free cable. Have you set the gearbox-end of the actuating mechanism up correctly to get a proper rotation of the arm? Sorry if I've misunderstood the problem but I can assure you that the Hemmings kit not only can work but works beautifully on mine, light and positive and no oil leaks from a dry clutch.

Adam

Permalink

Have same problem on my Dommi with laydown box Have measured pull needed to disengage clutch completely, which is less than provided by handlebar lever

In my case this is exacerbated by using non standard levers Am working on a solution

I bought one of these

http://www.trialsbits.co.uk/advanced_search_result.php?keywords=Easy+Clutch+Cable+Lightener&osCsid=fn4fcmlik8qemru0r96ho8b5e1&x=8&y=4

but it doesn't have sufficient advantage in my case

Laurence

Permalink

I think that there is a problem with the use of a Commando diaphragm clutch on the laydown (or earlier) box as the operating worm when turning through roughly 120? simply doesn't provide enough lateral movement to disengage.

There is a post on the Commando forum showing what one of the Flanders Branch members has made to get round the problem on his isolastic wideline. It's very similar to what Laurence has linked above but with the possibility to experiment.

http://www.accessnorton.com/post153341.html#p153341

Levers with 1 1/16" centres might help a little.

I suspect that a Newby belt kit is probably the best option where a box other than the AMC type is to be used.

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans