Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

ES2 clutch spring length

Forums

I know there have been previous threads on this topic but I couldn't find a definitive answer. What's the length of an uncompressed spring on a mid-fifties singles clutch? I know they're not expensive but I don't want to bin the current set if they're OK. George

Permalink

Hi George, I don't have any singles info but have had spring problems that were down to the gauge of wire being a fraction too big and springs being over tempered. The stiffness of the spring being no guide to the suitability of the part. Try RGM.

Permalink

Hi George

Just measured my M50 spring length.............1.760" Dia .104" My bike is 1960, slimline so may not be the same as yours, and maybe the 500s had bigger/stronger springs? .............Hope this helps

Regards John O

Permalink

That's useful, John. I checked the length of mine before close of play today and got one at 1.79" and two at 1.76". Didn't check the diameter. Found another thread which led to a web site which gave the data as 1.781" long and 2.64mm (0.104")dia. All seems very hit and miss. Maybe yours were the correct length but have a few miles under their belts?

George

Permalink

That's useful, John. I checked the length of mine before close of play today and got one at 1.79" and two at 1.76". Didn't check the diameter. Found another thread which led to a web site which gave the data as 1.781" long and 2.64mm (0.104")dia. All seems very hit and miss. Maybe yours were the correct length but have a few miles under their belts?

George

Permalink

George, what makes you think your springs may be not of the correct length? are you getting clutch slip? if so, just tighten them a bit (make sure the spring does not become 'coil bound' when you try to disengage the plates).and try to check that the clutch disengages evenly, ie same pressure on each spring.

I fitted a diaphragm clutch and belt drive quite a few years ago, hence I was able to measure my old springs easily, I have no idea how many miles the clutch has on it, but before I changed to a diaphragm type it didn't give any problems.

Regards John O

Permalink

Good point, John, but I'm not say they are incorrect. I was trying to find out the correct length so that I could decide whether I needed to renew them as I have everything apart at the moment. The fact that I have one shorter than the other two means I don't know which is correct. As for the differential tightening, I have done this in the past but by rights all the springs should be tightened fully on this particular clutch. The reason I'm being a bit pedantic about is 'cos when it all goes back together (including the dismantled g/box) I want it to be as good as I can get it. Hopefully! Cheers, George

Permalink

Year 1948-1949: Spring free length in inches: 1.8 Wire diameter: 0.104

Year 1950-1956: Spring free length in inches:1.781: Wire diameter 0.116

Year 1957 - : Spring free length in inches: 1.781. Wire diameter 0.104

Dominator 650: Spring free length in inches 1.700. Wire diameter 0.116

Permalink

Previously anthony_curzon wrote:

Year 1948-1949: Spring free length in inches: 1.8 Wire diameter: 0.104

Year 1950-1956: Spring free length in inches:1.781: Wire diameter 0.116

Year 1957 - : Spring free length in inches: 1.781. Wire diameter 0.104

Dominator 650: Spring free length in inches 1.700. Wire diameter 0.116

The data applies to all non-racing bikes post-war up to the first 650 Twins.

Permalink

That sounds definitive enough, Anthony. The lengths seem to be tying up at 1.781 but slight divergence on thickness. Dare I ask the source of the info? George

Permalink

Something I have tried in the past to equalize the throwout on the pressure plate is to shim under the bolts. Easy to figure shim thickness by backing off the bolts(which should be fully tightened) til the plate spins evenly when disengaged and translate the tpi of the bolts back into a shim. Hope this makes sense.

Permalink

That's right Michael. Washers or shims could well correct any discrepancies in length. (although I'm not sure about compression). May be I was looking for perfection by trying to get 3 springs all the same (correct) length.

Permalink

Seems like there is enough discrepancy in dimensions of all the components here that even if the springs all measure the same, you don't always get an even throwout and some tweaking may be required.

Permalink

Previously George Phillips wrote:

Thanks Michael. Do you happen to know the tpi of the clutch bolts?

I think they're cycle ie 26 tpi.

Permalink

Thanks Ian. That adds a good touch of further authenticity to it. Those details are going in my file. Cheers - George

Permalink

A useful mod is to replace the 3 clutch spring studs with the equivalent parts from the AMC clutch. The sleeve nuts (replacing the hex bolts) are not bottomed out so each one can be set individually to achieve even lifting of the plates. Russell Motors can supply them. Easier than faffing around with shims under the bolt heads.

Ian McD

Permalink

That sounds interesting, Ian. I have a parts list for 1957 Mod 77/88/99 which shows the AMC gearbox but - as far as I can tell - exactly the same clutch as I have (55 ES2). Could you attach a pic? George

Permalink

OOps. My mistake, Ian. On closer inspection I can now see that my one has a hex bolt screwing into a hollow stud whereas 1957 unit has a sleeve nut screwing onto a bolt. Silly question - if they do not "bottom out" how do you know how far to tighten them? George

Permalink

hi george,i agree with ian,on my 55 m7 with the laydown box i changed from the original set up to the amc mod.well worth it,after a bit of tweaking a nice square lift is achieved,no clutch drag now. exchange the screws for the amc studs and nuts,keep the original springs if good, les

Permalink

Good question. The '57 Instruction Book says to tighten them right home but I'm not convinced as the main advantage of the design is that the sleeve nuts have an anti-rotation "pip" that catches the open end of the spring coil so will not move in service. This means that individual springs can be adjusted so that the plates separate evenly. You end up doing it by feel: tight enough for the clutch not to slip, loose enough to maintain a light action on the clutch lever. From memory mine are tightened so that the studs are protruding just a few threads beyond the top of the sleeve nut. You need a broad screwdriver with a slot filed in the centre of the blade to allow the stud to protrude. Purpose made adjusting tools are available.

Ian McD

Permalink

Thanks guys. I'll add them to my (growing) list of things-to-buy. Thanks also to Ian for his email. If all goes well I might even end up with a good clutch! George

Permalink

I would not bother with the "purpose made tool" these are often made from some sort of metalic cheese. I bought a huge screwdriver for £8 and using the small angle grinder cut a slot in it for the stud. Much better in use and still good as a screwdriver!.

Permalink

Fair comment, Robert. Currently I use an old galvanised metal gate hinge with a slot cut into the pointy end. It sort of works but considering what I'm about to spend, another £8 is neither here nor there! George

Permalink

Managed to source a 12mm screwdriver bit on E-Bay which takes a 5/16" drive. This means I can slip it into the tool kit (it's only about 50mm long). The option was a 12mm screwdriver which was anything from 250 -300mm long and three times the price. Once the new friction inserts arrive I can start the re-build of the clutch and see how this idea works. I'll grind out a slot for the bolt. Thanks for all the help.

George

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans