Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Painful centre stands

Forums

I think whoever designed the centre stand currently available from AN and RGM â they look the same to me, and may be available elsewhere â was either wearing wooden clogs when they tried it, or didn't try it at all. I find one I just bought from RGM painful to use, whereas the original wasn't the slightest bit uncomfortable, assuming you were wearing reasonably sensible footwear. I'm grateful that this part is available for my 43-year-old bike, but it shouldn't hurt.

Attachments IMG_1797.jpg IMG_1799.jpg technical
Permalink

When my centre stand broke in half on my Mk III Commando a kind neighbour welded a tube inside and joined the broken halves together making the original part even stronger. He also identified the major weakness of the design; the hole for the spring is in the centre of the tube and which allows water to enter - this causes the tube to eventually rust through and split apart. My neighbour made a loop which attached to the tube on the outside and angled this to suit the spring accordingly. All in all a very nice job and it allowed me to retain another part of the original machine.

Colin Cheney, Leicestershire.

Permalink

Good story. My original centre stand first broke as you describe around 13 years ago, and was repaired in a similar way, I was then working a few doors along from a blacksmith who sorted me out in no time. But this time the crossbar has broken from the right leg â I suppose the old repair moved the weakest point out to the sides â and I no longer have a blacksmith handy. Hence the decision to retire the old centre stand. Something I neglected to mention in my first post is that I know of another Commando owner who also finds his centre stand painful to use â but I haven't established yet whether it's OE or a new-style replacement.

Permalink

My Mk3 has a RGM-supplied centre stand with a small pad, like Colin's. I did buy it 15 years ago, I might add, and RGM's current stock may be different.

My experience with the stand is that it is perfectly comfortable and easy to use with motorcycling or work boots on. However, I was moving the bike in the garage one day and was wearing an old pair of trainers. I put the bike on its centre stand and the pad on the stand went straight through the sole of my trainers!

I put that down to operator error, rather than a design problem!

Permalink

Ow, I bet that hurt! I would agree that decent bike boots stop most of the 'ow factor', reducing it to a mild impression, but, as Allan's experience suggests, we aren't always about to hop on our bikes when we move them. Compare these two further images for the difference in design, and consider how one spreads pressure on the foot while the other focuses it.

Attachments IMG_1795.jpg IMG_1800.jpg
Permalink

Previously Colin Peterson wrote:

I think whoever designed the centre stand currently available from AN and RGM â they look the same to me, and may be available elsewhere â was either wearing wooden clogs when they tried it, or didn't try it at all. I find one I just bought from RGM painful to use, whereas the original wasn't the slightest bit uncomfortable, assuming you were wearing reasonably sensible footwear. I'm grateful that this part is available for my 43-year-old bike, but it shouldn't hurt.

Hi Colin, I have an RGM supplied version and I think it's poorly designed too; its legs are about an inch too long and there's no pad, just a blade on the tang pusher; very thick soled boots and a helluva lot of pressure to lift the bike on the stand are essential, or assistance from a passer-by or temporary fitting of a 2 foot long tube slipped over the tang to apply downward force on the tang. I'll let RGM know we are not impressed with their product. Chris

Permalink

Previously chris_moorhouse wrote:

Hi Colin, I have an RGM supplied version and I think it's poorly designed too; its legs are about an inch too long and there's no pad, just a blade on the tang pusher; very thick soled boots and a helluva lot of pressure to lift the bike on the stand are essential, or assistance from a passer-by or temporary fitting of a 2 foot long tube slipped over the tang to apply downward force on the tang. I'll let RGM know we are not impressed with their product. Chris

Hi Chris, yes they do need to know! Cheers. Although, oddly given what you say, my RGM centre stand puts the bike at about the right height, or might even be â" or ?" too short! Thing for me is mainly that, grateful though I am to be able to get this part for my 43-year-old motorcycle, I was always impressed by how easy it was to put it on its centre stand, especially on level ground. This is no longer the case, and I find it very frustrating when 'reproduction' parts turn out to be nothing of the sort â rather, just someone's version of the original.

Permalink

Previously Colin Peterson wrote:

Previously chris_moorhouse wrote:

Hi Colin, I have an RGM supplied version and I think it's poorly designed too; its legs are about an inch too long and there's no pad, just a blade on the tang pusher; very thick soled boots and a helluva lot of pressure to lift the bike on the stand are essential, or assistance from a passer-by or temporary fitting of a 2 foot long tube slipped over the tang to apply downward force on the tang. I'll let RGM know we are not impressed with their product. Chris

Hi Chris, yes they do need to know! Cheers. Although, oddly given what you say, my RGM centre stand puts the bike at about the right height, or might even be â" or ?" too short! Thing for me is mainly that, grateful though I am to be able to get this part for my 43-year-old motorcycle, I was always impressed by how easy it was to put it on its centre stand, especially on level ground. This is no longer the case, and I find it very frustrating when 'reproduction' parts turn out to be nothing of the sort â rather, just someone's version of the original.

I've been in touch with RGM and have it straight from the horse's mouth; the drawings of the modifications to the centre stand have been sent off already to the manufacturer's. So, Roger has his finger on the pulse and ear to the ground in striving to meet the needs of the Norton riding world. Here's hoping. ChrisM

Permalink

Previously chris_moorhouse wrote:

I've been in touch with RGM and have it straight from the horse's mouth; the drawings of the modifications to the centre stand have been sent off already to the manufacturer's. So, Roger has his finger on the pulse and ear to the ground in striving to meet the needs of the Norton riding world. Here's hoping. ChrisM

Oh well done! I'll be interested to see what happens next, for example to help out those of us who are less than delighted with what we've already got ...! Cheers.
Permalink

Hi all. Just wondering if you are still on 19 inch rims and standard profile tyres as anything smaller will make the bike harder to put on the centre stand as you are having to lift it higher of course. I have an original centre stand but 18 inch rear rim and it does take a bit of effort to get it up and on to it. Best regards Al.

Permalink

I have 18 inch rims but the tyres are deeper Bridgestones, both tyres and stand rest on the floor. I can move the bike on engine vibration forward or back. I also find the stand bad, the other day when swapping my bikes around I went to move my Bonneville after just putting the Norton on the stand and nearly threw it down the garage. It is not the weight difference it is the stand design/manufacture. If you watch the Norton Commando Transformer recording by Steve Twist, Neil Shoosmith has no problem rocking the bike off of the stand. I bet that stand is just right.

A nice bike and a good recording.

Permalink

Over time the stand pivots, stand stops and gearbox cradle all wear, I just had welding done to the stand stops to lift the bike 2 months ago and dressed the weld back so one wheel is off the floor by about 1.5 inches. I can now push the bike off the stand while sat on the bike. I have the original 19 rims.

Permalink

Previously Colin Peterson wrote:

I think whoever designed the centre stand currently available from AN and RGM â they look the same to me, and may be available elsewhere â was either wearing wooden clogs when they tried it, or didn't try it at all. I find one I just bought from RGM painful to use, whereas the original wasn't the slightest bit uncomfortable, assuming you were wearing reasonably sensible footwear. I'm grateful that this part is available for my 43-year-old bike, but it shouldn't hurt.

Hi Colin,

The stand you show in the 'Replacement' pictures is correct for the 850 MkIII.

The one you show as OE is correct for earlier models.

So the designer is Norton !

Regards

Tony

Permalink

Interesting Tony, so it is! Not having a MK3 handy, I just checked my copy of 'The Powerchoice' poster for that and the T160, the MK3's centre stand tang is clearly visible. Do you have a MK3, Tony? Now I'm wondering how MK3 owners get along with their centre stands. I've had to change my approach to only using my right foot to hold the tang down, while putting pressure on my left foot, on the ground, and pulling the bike backwards, only doing a little lifting.

Even so it's the only design of tang offered by AN or, as far as I can tell, RGM for my MK2A. Other stands offered by AN have the same design, apart from the (currently) unavailable stand for engine numbers below 141783. So nothing's changed about this issue for me!

Permalink

Yes, the Mk3 has always had a pad on the arm. I have attached a photo of my current, totally original Mk3 stand that is waiting for refinishing.I personally never had any problem with the stand. My first Mk3 was an Interpol with full three-piece fairing and panniers and even with the extra weight, the stand was fine. But I never went out in ballet shoes - even on the bike!AndyAttachments img_0676-jpg

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans