Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

AMC gearbox problem

Forums

Another gearbox problem looking for a solution;

Ihave rebuilt my box using both the Mick Hemmings article and the Old Brits website info. Howver, I cannot select any gears or, at best, can make only one change (eg from 2nd into neutral but then nothing more).

I have searched the web and read all of the NOC articles but no joy. I am absolutely sure timing is correct and if, with the cover removed, I fit the ratchet I can select each gear (and neutral) with no problem. I have checked the (new) hairspring and it is fitted the correct way round (bent leg to the bottom) and there is just a small clearance between it and each side of the pawl (and the pawl rotates freely)

What I have noticed is that with the gearchange assembled into the outer cover, there seems to be limited gearlever movement. It almost seems as though the return spring is somehow restricting how far the pawl carrier can rotate - I have compared it with another cover and that seems to have a much greater range of rotation. The carrier moves to each end of the slot in the stop plate if the spring is removed.

So, I think that the carrier doesn't rotate sufficiently to allow the pawl to engage with the ratchet.

I have spoken with the (reputable) supplier of the spring and he is not aware of any issues with them.

any ideas?

Thanks

Colin

Permalink

Previously colin_ansell wrote:

Another gearbox problem looking for a solution;

Ihave rebuilt my box using both the Mick Hemmings article and the Old Brits website info. Howver, I cannot select any gears or, at best, can make only one change (eg from 2nd into neutral but then nothing more).

I have searched the web and read all of the NOC articles but no joy. I am absolutely sure timing is correct and if, with the cover removed, I fit the ratchet I can select each gear (and neutral) with no problem. I have checked the (new) hairspring and it is fitted the correct way round (bent leg to the bottom) and there is just a small clearance between it and each side of the pawl (and the pawl rotates freely)

What I have noticed is that with the gearchange assembled into the outer cover, there seems to be limited gearlever movement. It almost seems as though the return spring is somehow restricting how far the pawl carrier can rotate - I have compared it with another cover and that seems to have a much greater range of rotation. The carrier moves to each end of the slot in the stop plate if the spring is removed.

So, I think that the carrier doesn't rotate sufficiently to allow the pawl to engage with the ratchet.

I have spoken with the (reputable) supplier of the spring and he is not aware of any issues with them.

any ideas?

Thanks

Colin

did you select second gear before replacing the outer cover, !!!

Permalink

Check all of the springs in the outer section. There are several possible causes for non-selection because of problems with these items.

First I would look at the big chunky one that keeps the selector arm central. These can split but appear ok. The result is no gear changes after one push of the lever. It is a pain to pull out of the cover to look at but is always first on my check list of a gearbox that will not select.

Secondly. The thin selector spring with the kink has to be exactly the right shape or it will not do its job properly. There are lots of copies of these on the market and fitting a cheapo one can be a waste of time. Also it must be the fitted correctly with the straight leg at the top....Why I just do not know?

Third. If the gearbox does not select gears when using a spanner on the outside camplate bolt then I would be checking the plate for a mistake during assembly.

Attachments Gearbox%20Springs.bmp
Permalink

Thanks for the ideas but I have still not resolved this. The gearchange selector return spring is also new but i am still bothered by the fact that it looks to be restricting the selector arm's movement. It seeems to me that when the spring 'winds up' in either direction it is being restricetd by the boss that the selector arm runs through -as if the id of the spring is too small.

Does anyone have a spare spring that they could measure for me (inside diameter and wire diameter)? Also, can anyone give me an idea of how much gearlever movement i should expect - can someone measure theirs (either in approximate degrees or distance up/down at the 'rubber' end)?

Permalink

Attachments illustrates the point I was making above about the big variations you can get with these springs. The kinked leg, in the selector spring, is critcial for the gearbox to work correctly. Only one out of that group of five actually allowed a full selection.

The big selector arm return springs are equally different in style plus, as I mentioned, if this one cracks you become roadsided very quickly.

A very important point I forgot to mention was the big washer that sits behind theselector arm return spring. It has to be there and must be the correct size. Different thicknesses or diameters of this item will also cause that spring to stop doing its job properly.

Pic with spring measurements is somewhere else in this thread.

Attachments AMC%20Gearbox%20Spring%20Sizes.bmp picture-002-jpg
Permalink

Phil's advice is all spot-on. There is some obscure black magic that goes on inside AMC gearbox covers and it can't be explained by conventional engineering or physics...

Have you seen this thread on Access Norton ? Apparently there are even different spring stop plates and some cause more problems that others...

http://www.accessnorton.com/gearchange-problem-solved-t16826.html?hilit=pawl%20plate#p208355

The washer that Phil mentioned is indeed very important. If placed the wrong side, it causes no end of problems and yet it's something that doesn't have an obvious function.

Permalink

Phil/Richard et al - thanks for your advice.

Re the AccessNorton thread - whilst it is a little confusing I think I have the washer in the correct place. I think that the order of assembly (with an empty outer cover) is (using the part descriptions from the parts book);

spring return gearchange (D55)

Washer, return spring (D56)

Carrier, pawl (D51)

So, the washer is between the gearlever return spring and the pawl carrier. From what I can see the washer's purpose is to provide a bearing surface to the spring so that it doesn't rub on the pawl carrier.

I have checked the range of movement I have with just the spring, washer, pawl carrier and stop plate fitted to the outer cover - using a digital level it seeems to be approximately 11 degrees - this is somwhat less than the stop plate allows. i am now sure that the spring is effectively winding up on the outer cover bos thereby restricting further movement.

My spring measures 29mm id (less than shown in Phil's very useful pictures) and the bos looks to be around 28mm dia.

Even with the apparent variations in springs, I assume that I am right in thinking that the spring is designed to 'wind up' during gearchange? This would have the effect of reducing the spring's id (as it tightens up) and would end up compressing around the boss of the cover.

Attached is a picture of my spring and it fitted to the cover.

I think I need to find a 'looser' spring?

Attachments IMG_9433.JPG img_9432-jpg
Permalink

Fixed it!

I'm pleased to announce that the problem is now sorted.

I spoke with Mick Hemmings and he confirmed my theory about the spring winding-up on the gearchange shaft boss. He said that he has seen this before (and that he has seen all sorts of odd springs as well!).

Anyway,I took Mr Dremel for an outing and ground off a small amount of the diameter of the boss. The return spring was then a looser fit and this gave me gearlever movement almost to the extremes of the stop plate slot. I refitted the cover (after cleaning out the ali filings of course) and I now have perfectly slick gearchange.

Mick concurred with the views expressed on this forumthat AMC box gearchange is a bit of a black art especially when assembling a box using bits (as mine was) - there seemed to be a deal of variability in how they were manufactured and so are not always interchangeable without a bit of 'help'.

Thanks again for all the responses.

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans