Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

AMC clutch

Forums

Good morning

Does anybody know what the correct length of AMC clutch springs should be? (or at what point should they be renewed?)

Also, does anybody know what the thickness of the stack of plates should be? (or the thickness of each individual plate?)

According to what I've just read on Andover Norton's website, these two specifications are linked... But they do not give data.

Permalink

Not sure about the length of the springs but the most important thing is that all three are virtually identical otherwise the clutch plates will lift at an angle.

They are only about £2 each so if in doubt it is worth replacing them.

Different makes of clutch plate tend to vary in thickness hence it can be difficult to be exact(for any bike)..If there is a reasonable level of friction material visible then again there is no real concern.

Permalink

There were two slightly difffering lengths of spring. Depending on whether the clutch is a standard pre-1961 (SS) type or later. The later SS clutch springs are shorter and thicker.

The stack size/thickness depends on the plates. Some dealers have sold replacement driver plates that were so thick you could net get the correct number into the basket without the top two jumping out on on full lift.

Permalink

I have two sets of three clutch springs in my old used parts box. All are 1+7/8" long and are from a 1963 SS engine.
Permalink

Thanks David. As John said, the springs are so cheap that it was harly worth the trouble! Sorry to bother you with this!

Permalink

Attachment shows the whole range of Dominator clutch spring lengths from 1948 up to 1970. The SS springs are marked with *.

It appears that after the Laydown gearbox was superseeded by the post 56 AMC type, the spring part number changed from D2/399 to 040385 and remained as such even after the introduction of the SS clutch.

Attachments norton-clutch-springs-bmp

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans