Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Cylinder head to barrel fitment problem

Forums

I had to get a new cylinder head and barrels for my basket case Dommie 99 as the originals were junk ( I now know the true meaning of the phrase ’buyer beware’).
When I tried to do a dry fit of the cylinder head to the barrel, it wouldn’t fit over the flame rings on the barrel. After lots of measuring, I worked out that the cylinder bores aren’t correctly spaced. That was confirmed by attempting to fit a head gasket onto the head. The gasket fits over one flame ring but it then can’t be fitted over  the other flame ring as the cylinder bores are 3/16 inch closer together than they should be. All of the bolt holes in the gasket line up with the bolt holes in the barrel so I’m convinced that it’s the barrel bores that are at fault. I’d read on the Forum that some Bracebridge barrels were a bit ‘out of alignment’ but I didn’t think I’d ever get to see one, let alone own a set of them.! 
I spent this afternoon scraping the ring recesses in the head to open them up a bit. The The head now fits over the flame rings and the rings bottom out on the inside of the head. There’s a 0.4mm gap between the head and barrels that I hope will be filled by the gasket - does that gap sound correct? 

SThe head now fits over the flame rings but I’ll need to modify a gasket as well by opening up the cylinder holes in the gasket. That means I can’t use a composite gasket as it just springs apart when I enlarge the cylinder holes - the flame ring bands in the gasket have to be removed and when that’s done, the gasket seems to lose all integral strength. I’m therefore going to try and get a solid copper gasket and modify that by opening up the cylinder holes, or if I can’t get one, I’ll have to get a piece of copper sheet and make my own gasket.

Have I done the right thing or have I gone down the complete wrong path?

I know that the better course of action would be to buy a ‘correct’ set of barrels but the ones I’ve got are my second set and they cost me £400 so I’m loathe to spend yet more money on barrels.

Any advice, hints, guidance gratefully accepted.

Thanks

Tony

Permalink

Tony, you say your cylinder bores are 3/16" closer together than they should be. With an error of this size I cannot see how you're  going to get the barrels over the pistons , even if you manage it I feel the pistons will be at the limit of their horizontal play . I think this sounds like a non starter as the error is too large. Just my opinion, unless you've  already tried.

Permalink

A 750 barrel would have the bores closer together. By about 2.5mm each side or 5mm in total. 5mm is very close to 3/16".  Has somebody made a cock-up???   Check that the head gasket fits all the barrel and head bolts holes nearly perfectly.

Permalink

Hi.

Thanks to everyone who has replied. The bolt holes in the head gasket line up perfectly with the bolt holes in the barrels and the ones in the head. I can assemble the barrels and head together and all holes line up. The head is a single carb non-downdraft type. It has the correct casting number for a 60’s engine but there is no letter after the number - my other ‘junk’ heads all have a letter after the number. Not sure if the fact that my head doesn’t have a letter after the number is significant or not. Regarding piston alignment, I haven’t tried that yet as the engine is still fully stripped - I guess I just need to wait and see what problems await me when I start to build it.

Thanks again - much appreciated.

Regards

Tony

Permalink

Hello Tony, thinking about your problem, you say you have bought a NEW head and barrel the bores of which are closer together by 3/16" than they should be. When you refer to flame rings on the barrel I assume you're  speaking of location spigots atop the barrel. What I'm failing to under stand is ,  if your error is as great as you say  the head would need to be machined because no ammount of scraping could correct a 3/16"error ,and you now say that the head and barrel are united.  Are they brand new or just new to you ?                    The normal distance between the 99 bores is about 3/4" inside bore to inside bore. Puzzling indeed, I shall continue to watch . 

Permalink

Makes you wonder if a barrel was machined to fit liners and somehow  the centers got changed , from the posting that could have been the old scrapped barrel? As the replacements seem to match the new head.Perhaps we are off the beam here.

Permalink

Hi. Sorry to have been confusing. Both the barrels and the head are ‘new’ to me, but used by previous owners. The barrels came from George Yeoman's in the Midlands and the head was an ebay ‘bargain’ (joke!). The barrels were on standard bores but I couldn’t find good, original STD pistons so I had the barrels bored out to +20 as I found some genuine old stock +20 Hepolite pistons. It does look like the barrels have liners fitted, but I don’t know if liners were installed as standard even on brand new barrels from Bracebridge St. or if they have been installed (badly?) by a previous owner. I’m going to try and measure everything more accurately tomorrow and will report back.

Thanks again for your interest and input.

Tony

Permalink

Orriginal barrels had the appearance of having liners because of the way the  cylinders extended into the cases. But they were a one piece casting .

Permalink

Tony..........check out this list of cylinder head casting numbers. For your single carb head these will be on the top.

22707 (usually plus single suffix letter) - all alloy plus raised cross-hatching between the rocker spindle plates. These are late 1958 to  late 1961 heads.

T2225 (some with suffix letter M but no cross-hatching) - these have full alloy finning across the front between exhaust ports. The area between the rocker spindle paltes is plain.

T2225 (no suffix letter) -  also full alloy finning but stepped up between the exhaust ports. These are generally 1955 to 1957ish.

T2225 - same as above but all iron. 1950 to 1955 heads. Mostly found on Model 7s and early 88s.

T2212 - Available in iron or to special order in alloy. No suffix letter. 1953 to 1955

Permalink

Hi Robert, The reason that I thought the barrels might have liners in is because I can see an offset concentric line around the outside of each bore. The distance from the inside wall of each bore to the concentric line is 3.15mm (bearing in mind that I’ve had the barrels rebored to +20, so the distance would have been slightly bigger originally). The thickness of each location spigot (what I called a ‘flame ring’) is 1.65mm. The smallest size of the land between the outer edges of the spigots is 14.55mm
I’ve now looked at the underside of the barrels - they don’t look good. There’s more evidence of liners and of ooor installation as the thickness of the spigots that extend into the crankcases vary in thickness quite considerably  (photos below). It looks like one liner has been installed offset from the centre line of the original bore. My fear now is that these barrels are scrap.

Comments and observations gratefully accepted.

Tony

Permalink

Hi Philip. My head is a 22707 type but there’s no letter code after the number.

Thanks

Tony

Permalink

Definitely liners,but I don't suppose the original  bores would be truly concentric with the castings. As long as the bores are parallel to each other  I would put it together anyway.I have seen much worse liner installations If the pistons enter the cylinders and it turns over freely.. Give it a go.I would.

Permalink

Hi Robert. Thanks for the positive thoughts - I was getting quite resigned to adding to my ever-growing pile of Norton junk but I’ll have a go at putting it all together and see if the pistons move freely in their respective bores.

Thanks

Tony

Permalink

hello  Can put up some better photos of all the bottom end of the barrel and top end of the barrel  AS the part of the barrel in these photos look like someone has fitted a set of sleeve wrong  this looks like they have machined down the centerline, where Norton barrels where machined off set to the centre of the barrel So you get a measurement difference  So if this is the case then the barrels you have bought from Yeomans are at fault And I would return them  As there Not fit for purposes and as Yeomen are a dealer  the will come under trading standards act of resale,     Yours Anna J 

Permalink

Tony, Since the engine  is all in bits I have the following suggestions. If you have the equipment or have a machine shop handy, make a mandrel of correct diameter to fit the rods with the bearings removed. Fit the rods onto this mandrel with the same distance  between the rods as when they are mounted on the flywheels. Fit the pistons without the rings. Turn the barrels upside down and lower the pistons into the bores. If the rods are not in the centre of the pistons the barrels are cactus. You could do the same using the crankshaft but it would be heavy and unwieldy. A quick visit to the cave has discovered a piece of 1.5 inch outside diameter exhaust pipe. Fit an old set of bearings and maybe a bit of masking tape and you have a 10p mandrel.

Hope this quick and easy fix helps. Anything you care to leave under the plate will be gratefuly accepted.

Permalink

I think I would just fit the barrels  to the engine and check that the rods are close to  central in the bores. Unlikely that they will be perfectly central anyway. As long as the piston pin bosses are not tight to the small ends you will have a working engine not untypical  to what the Industry produced most of the time. Should be able to measure the gap rod face  to bore surface and compare to piston boss.

Permalink

I had another look at all of my barrels today. I took one that’s completely original and on standard bore and placed them correct way up onto a sheet of plain paper. I then used a pencil to draw a line around the inside of each bore (so tracing around the inner edge at the bottom of each bore). I then repeated the actions with the barrels we’ve been discussing. When I place one sheet of paper over the other, the lines drawn around the inside edges of the bores line up perfectly. To me that shows that the bottoms of the bores are in the correct alignment with regard to the piston positions.

I repeated the exercise with the barrels inverted (so tracing around the internal edge of the bores at the top of the barrels). That showed the same result - the two sets of tracings align perfectly. As both tracings align with a known set of ‘good’ bores, I’m reasonably confident that the bores in my ‘new’ barrels are correctly aligned in relation to the pistons. 
I think that the thing that confused me and sent me on the route to madness was why the outer edges of the barrels where the two are closest together were closer together than ‘normal’ (as indicated by the gasket not fitting in that area). That was before I realised that liners had been fitted. I can only think that the liners have thicker top spigot walls than standard, hence the cylinder head not fitting properly over the spigots (until I’d eased the spigot recesses slightly).

I’ll now continue with the build and check the small end alignment very carefully once the rods are on the crank.

Thank you everyone for your advice, opinions and suggestions- they were all extremely useful.

Regards

Tony

Permalink

Its very important that the flame rings stay in position. If they can be hit by a piston or are otherwise insecure they can wreck the motor. If they are in doubt I have heard of motors being run without them and not to have a problem.

Permalink

The best way, but not necessarily the easiest way, to find out what the bore centres need to be for your bike is to measure the big-end journal centres. They may or may not be to original factory specs but your bores need to match your crankshaft.  Space between bores isn't an accurate way to measure.  As Anna says, measure the bore centres at the top and the bottom to make sure that any previous work hasn't boogered it!

Permalink

You are doing the right thing,checking carefully and questioning everything that was done before.Don't assume anything is right .  You will waste some time but the satisfaction when it works well is more than enough reward.

Permalink

Some new liners are supplied with a small exterior lip / flange on the top edge.  This lip sits up against the gasket and prevents the liners from coming loose and dropping into the crankcases. Other barrels need to be machined to accept this lip. On spigoted barrels similar replacement liners have a stepped spigot machined. Thus saving the liners from having to be pegged/pinned in place.  See attachment.

Attachments
Permalink

Hi.

Philip, thanks for the drawings of the liners. I think mine must have a lip around the top spigots as there’s a concentric line offset from each spigot. That line is larger in diameter than the outer edge of the liners at the bottom of the bores, hence my guess that the top spigots are lipped.
I’m in the process of building up the bottom end so once I’ve got the conrods fitted and the crankshaft installed, I’ll be doing lots more measuring to check on the positions of the rods in the top and bottom of the cylinder bores.

Thanks to everyone for continued contributions.

Tony

Permalink

I finally got to the bottom of my cylinder issue ( I think). When I ordered my gasket set from one of the major suppliers, I assumed that they would send me the correct head gasket. Guess what? I now know that the one they sent was for spigotless barrels - that’s why the gasket’s ‘web wouldn’t fit between the spigots - it was too big because it didn’t have to accommodate the width of the spigots. I’ve never had a bike with spigotted barrels before so didn’t know how different the two gaskets were. Now I’ve got the correct gasket (I went for solid copper), it fits fine - I just had to file a small amount (about 1/64 inch) from the central web part so it would slide easily between the spigots.

Of course, I won’t know how well the cylinder bores line up with the crankshaft journals, but I’m keeping my fingers crossed.

Thanks again for all your help.

Regards

Tony

 



© 2024 Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans