Happy New Year everyone!
a new year and an old question!
I’m sure I’ve read it somewhere here about tyre choice, but for some reason, since the new website layout? I am not able to find previous post again...
As the winter is upon us, my bike is having its winter hibernation, so I want to get him some new shoes.
Currently, my 1954 Domi 88 has Avon Speedmaster on it, but I really don’t feel like I’m enjoying the way it turns in.
so I’m looking at going with Avon RoadRider AM26. 90/90 19 , 100/90 19.
Anyone have had these tyres on your Domi88?
Im worried about the fitting on the front mostly, as the front fender looks like a tight fit?
Or what is the other choices out there for a more modern feel?
Thanks in advance
Richard
DOMINATOR TYRE CHOICE
- Log in to post comments
dunlop street smart are better
hello, Dunlop street smart are better and they do them for classic motorcycle wire wheels 300-19 and 350-19 new type tyres are very hard to fit you need the right tyre irons long ones and do fit new tubes and rim taps you start to fit the tyre from the valve end first and push in the valve right back and the tube with no valve in it, this is so the tyre bead fit nice to the inside of the rim , and work round steady and you need to use some tyre soap, and take your time be careful not to nip the tube, yours anna j
- Log in to post comments
Thanks Ronald and Anna. i…
Thanks Ronald and Anna.
i have read some good reviews (and bad) on the AM26. But tbh, not a thing about Dunlop street smart.
- Log in to post comments
dunlop
well i not had any trouble with dunlop they been real good and handling good to the dunlop arrow max street smart come in both metric or imperial Tyre sizes now metric sizes are harder to fit on wire wheels as there made as tubeless tyers , so try getting the imperial ones my Norton 650 size is 3.25 x 19 and 4,00x18 rear has it was an export Norton witch is the same size as BSA A65 and Triumph T120 and T140 all for export market, and the Yamaha XS650 were the same tyre sizes and you see i am droping in a few None Norton names here as these owners will have the same problems as anyone else yours anna j
- Log in to post comments
new tires.
If you can get the orriginal sizes I would go for them. Anything bigger can be an issue as I found out .
- Log in to post comments
The bike came with front 90…
The bike came with front 90/90 19, rear 100/90 19.
not original?
- Log in to post comments
Orriginal would have been…
Orriginal would have been 300x19 front and 3.50 x19 rear ,the Sizes you quote come out wider and if they fit then you are luckier than me.
- Log in to post comments
It’s tricky. Because the…
It’s tricky.
Because the conversion from imperial to matric
Front
3.00 = 90/90
3.25 = 90/90
so I’m not sure what is what. As I’ve always used matric.
rear
3.50 = 100/90
And I have zero knowledge about tyre sizing except buying what manufacturer states.
- Log in to post comments
Check Avon web site for…
Check Avon web site for width. The 90/90 will not fit my pre 1964 Dommie.
- Log in to post comments
Tyres for 88
Hello Richard - I have Dunlop TT100s on my 88 and have for 25+ years, having moved over from Avons SMs/Speedmasters (many moons ago) as currently on your bike, with no issues. I have heard it said, on great authority, that TT100s bugger up the handing on featherbeds, but they don't.
They look contemporary, are good enough for 100mph around the island, and are therefore good enough for me. I have 3.60 H19s front and 4.10 (!) H19 rear on both my 88 and 650SS (both slimline rear mudguards, and narrow front fork yokes for the 3.60s), and I would not fit anything else. Roadriders may ride OK, but you (probably, I dunno) reduce rolling diameter, and are guessing about size/clearance.
Most of all, Roadriders just look wrong. My tuppence hapworth.
(Hello Bob Tuck, BTW - HNY!)
R
- Log in to post comments
Couldn'd agree more with…
Couldn'd agree more with your comments Russ. I have run the same combination on both my 650SS and 1961 ES-2 as well as my Commando for many years now and handling on both featherbeds is faultless.
Also no problem with mudguard clearance with either 7" or 7 3/8" front forks.
- Log in to post comments
Unfortunate as with all…
Unfortunate as with all things German...
my vehicle paper states clearly front 3.25 19 and rear 3.50 19.
this means the shop I get to change the tyres will not do anything else outside of these numbers. And even if I was to do it my self, I would be concerned if (big IF) my bike is checked by any authorities.
I’ll check the width on the AM26 and Street Smart at this point to see if these will be ok I think.
- Log in to post comments
Strange Richard, The…
Strange Richard,
The official Norton handbook clearly states tyre sizes for the Dominator 88 & 99 to be 3.50x19 rear, and 300x19 front. The original combination, of Avon Speedmaster front, and, Avon SM rear is more than adequate for the performance of these machines. Unless you intend to go in for racing, why not stick to the original specification?
- Log in to post comments
For the size, the road…
For the size, the road authorities must of based the paper work on what was already on the bike when I had it delivered.
As for the ride... I don’t race and I don’t ride fast on this bike, but I have to admit, the feeing that the Speedmaster and SM combination does not confidence going around corners at a steady speed. I have had times when I felt the bike was just going to turn in and not swing back up, or it turned in way quicker than I expect and the rear felt like it was going to slide out. The squared rear visually really scares me to be fair.
Maybe it’s me and how I ride, and I’m use to a more rounded profile, but whenever I hop on the dominator or my XT600 with semi knobby tyres... I have to take at least a couple of hours to get used to the ride. Where as on the Commando I have never had an issue, tho I must admit, the Commando is a bike I use most.
- Log in to post comments
no, I checked the bike over…
no, I checked the bike over. It’s not too tight. Plus, I have tried changing the adjustment on the head and it made no difference.
- Log in to post comments
The issue you can have is…
The issue you can have is that the metric equivalents actually measure more than the old imperial sizes. Sometimes its not a problem , Sounds as if you can only fit the size tyres that are on your paperwork? Or can you fit the sizes that the bike was fitted with when new? Sounds to be a bit of a minefied!,, The sooner we are out of the EU................
- Log in to post comments
I would assume I could argue…
I would assume I could argue with the original factory sizes in hand and that the DEKRA (Local road testing authorities) got it wrong.
But yes, basically I have to use whatever it states in the paper. Tho in my case, 3.00 and 3.25 are both 90/90, so it would (I guess) depend on the manufacturer.
As for the Brexit thing, that’s a whole other can of worm I’m sure.
- Log in to post comments
The bikes do vary a fair…
The bikes do vary a fair bit. My slimline 99 with rear chaincase would not accept anything bigger than 3.50 x19.rear. A 90 90 will not go in on front or rear. The Atlas with wider forks will take a 90 90 on the front and a 3.60 x19 rear which the 99 (with the same frame) will not.Les Emery fitted a wider rear tyre to his 88DL , I wonder if his wheels are in line!!.My rear rim is dead central between the shocks.
- Log in to post comments
Dunlop's website lists three…
Dunlop's website lists three 19" 'Street Smart' tyres - the 90/90, 100/90 and 325. They are all listed as FRONT fitment. Is it OK to fit them to the rear?
This tyre looks very much like Avon's AM26. Very modern-looking tread pattern.
Paul
- Log in to post comments
You cant go wrong with the am26 90/90 on the front and 100/90 on the rear, just make sure that the front lower stay to mudguard fixing bolts are not too long.