Restoring my '67 650SS and struggling to identify the correct headlamp - I think the bike is currently non-standard (see photo).
I think the correct headlamp shell should be chrome, with ammeter and switch hole? However Norvil tell me the switch should be fitted on the clock mounting bracket, not in the headlamp shell.
Anyone got the correct info and/or photo?
Is this photograph any use? “1966 650SS”
Wow - slightly cleaner thann mine! That's how I envisaged the Norvil description. If that's correct then that's what I'll go with. Many thanks Paul. I'd be interested in seeing more photos if that's your bike - clearly a stunner.
Another one - seat - hump or no hump? I reckon hump came in at '68 - Novil say mine should have hump ('67). Cheers.
Hello Leonard - I cannot make out on the image the top yoke clearly. Does yours have the steering lock hole in the yoke that signifies they are the wide yokes ? Your year should have but people do all sorts of mods - usually following a shunt. If you have the narrow yokes there is a special instrument plate to suit. The switch yours would have had is a Lucas 88SA type 34289A. There is nothing wrong with the one you have (31784 known as 41SA). The mounting hole is bigger. It was fitted to earlier models in the long headlight with the integral speedometer. Your headlight would have been the Lucas Model SS700P with an ammeter and one warning light for main beam. Good luck, Howard
Not shure if it is original.
Thanks Howard - good information. Sorry about the quality of the photo. I didn't see any evidence of a steering lock when I dismantled the bike and my freshly powder coated top yoke has no hole in it. The fork stanchion centres seem to be 7". I guess I will get the 'special' bracket you mention (is that a Norvil part?) and a new switch, if required. It would not surprise me if this bike had been chopped around a bit as it had aftermarket, non standard headlamp brackets and a period glassfibre 'racing' seat. It is difficult to find reliable reference photos.
Hello again Len - Yes as I expected your bike has the older forks that were fitted until 1964. Those early 650SSs had the Dominator type headlight with the speedometer integral. The tacho mounted on a separate plate on the top nut of the right-hand fork leg. Firms like Unity Equip, RGM and Norvil will market a twin instrument plate with and without the switch hole. So you should be able to tailor what you buy to fit your requirements. You will need to specify your clocks ( chronometric or magnetic ) and probably your switch hole size. The plate was usually black on the later SSs but chrome was possible. There are stainless steel and alloy ones available. Good luck, Howard
Thanks Mikael, I agree - from what Howard has told me in the other replies that doesn't seem to be original. I'm not a stickler for originality but if I'm changing stuff I suppose I should make the effort to get it right. Thanks again. Len
Thanks again Howard,
As the forks are wrong anyway I'm tempted to just refurbish the individual clock holders already fitted and use a replacement headlamp shell taking the ammeter and switch - just replace the one fitted, as it were.
Norvil are also telling me that the headlamp brakets should be chrome, not black. I can't recall ever seeing chrome headlamp brackets on a 650SS?
Confused and frustrated from Danbury!!
Just to clarify, what are the centre-to-centre measurements for the early, and later yokes, Howard?
By the sounds of it Leonard, you can make a fair copy of the later set-up, despite the earlier forks.
Good project, and lovely bikes.
Hello Ian and Leonard - the early short Roadholders are 7 inch centres between the fork tubes and post 1964 ones are 7 3/8 inch centres. The later ones are usually distinguishable by the integral steering lock hole in the top yoke unless, of course, an alloy after-market item is fitted. With the yokes being wider and the front wheel/brake the same - the fork sliders are each 3/16 inch wider at the spindle, post 1964. None of the 650SS's had chrome headlamp shrouds unless the customer especially requested them. Hope that helps, regards, Howard
Thanks Howard. Those measurements have eluded me for a long time! The reason I ask, digressing slightly from the subject, is that I have a 1964 650SS-engined 1955 88 Wideline, with a Commando tls front brake, and the later wide yokes. I was pretty sure they were, but you have confirmed it. The top yoke has the steering lock hole.
ps Photo added, to show tank; see thread on tank painting!
Nice looking bike Ian - Unusual to see large-bore exhaust pipes on a 650 donk. It does however fit-in nicely on your Wideline as more reminiscent of a period Dominator. I once owned an Atlas that had large-bore (1 5/8 inch) pipes, apparently from new, but as you're probably aware they are very rare with the semi-downdraught heads. It's also nice see that you've tucked up your silencers to stop them grinding away. Cheers, Howard
Howard. Thanks. It is very pretty, isn't it?! Ok, I am biased.... I have owned it for 12 years, when the conversion had already been done. This is a photo from 5 years ago. It now has small-bore pipes fitted, despite understanding the aesthetic of the big bore pipes, which forced the change by cracking around the manifold flange. They were lower down the priority list of jobs to do; there were many....
My one concern with such a relatively powerful engine variant in the Wideline frame is the single front engine mounting point, rather than two, as on the Slimline. Had I carried out the work myself, I would have attended to that in the initial build. Seem ok though.
I also have straight bars fitted now, which I prefer. The problem I have is the handlebar clamps on the top yoke are too low to allow the brake and clutch cables a straight run from the levers. I am fabricating risers at the moment, to raise the bars maybe 3/4", in order to give the cables a proper route. Hence in part my interest in this thread, particularly the photos of controls/top yokes. One can see the cables are tightly running across the top of the fork top nuts.
However, I don't wish to high-jack Leonard's interesting thread!
Usually export bikes had more chrome than home market bikes. Guess we foreigners like bling. Also some of them had a more colourful paint jobs. The 650SS was even delivered with a flamboyant green tank.
Mikael. That is true about the colours. It was said that Norton would paint your bike any colour you wanted, provided your pockets were deep enough, although I don't know how true that was.
My mudguards I believe are Commando items. The tank was not chromed when I bought the bike, but would have been originally, so I had it repaired, chromed and painted at very great expense.
Interesting how these threads develop, isn't it? No problem Ian - as long as we're all learning and enjoying the ride I would never accuse you of 'hi-jacking my thread.' Nice bike, by the way.
We all trust these 'specialist' suppliers to provide the right parts - they are supposed to be the experts - right? However, like Howard, I can't accept the chrome headlamp bracket argument and will order self coloured ones and get them powder coated black. Regarding the headlamp/switch bracket argument I'm changing my stance slightly - I guess I need to talk to Norvil about getting a bracket to fit 7" forks to try and make it look original and also question whether the mudguards they specified also fit 7" forks. I had heard that people fit early Commando mudguards to 650SS because the latter are no longer available, the tools being scrapped in 1977. I assumed 'early Commando' was due to different fork sizes...but now I don't know as Howard reckons they changed in 1964.
Anyway - Howard, Ian and Mikael - thanks for your help and an interesting discussion on these Winter evenings. (My Ducati 796 never gives me these issues - I just ride it!!)
Leonard. I believe my mudguards are early Commando ones, and as we now know, my forks are the wide ones. I will check the clearance between the forks & mudguard on Sunday. Can't do it tomorrow as I am off to the Shepton Mallet show, 130 miles each way, so an early start. However, they are much slimmer, for want of a better word, than the original SS ones, which I thought were rather large for a sports model. It doesn't matter with mine. It is all Norton, but ranging from 1955-1970. However, if originality is important, you may have to take a view on it.
Hi Ian, If you intend to fit bar risers to solve the tight cable problem you may have to modify the steering damper if fitted. The risers work well on our Atlas but were fiddly to fit ,a 2 person job to hold everything .