Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Poor mpg

Forums

Having got my 63 m50 running better than ever I find that mpg is rather poor,only circa 50/53.

Is this normal? I am sure my old one did 70 or more.

I try to use super unleaded as we have leaded fuel locally,and use a lead substitute.

Permalink

Just maybe...are you riding faster to keep up with modern traffic?!My (late) friend told be he got much better MPG with his ES2 after he fitted an air filter. Theory is fuel gets sprayed out between suction pulses and the filter catches it so it gets sucked back in.Also. How many tanks have you run through it?David
Permalink

I have checked the mpg of my slimline model 50 (59 engine) over many years. I check from full tank to full tank and it always comes back at 78 mpg, regardless of solo or two up riding.

My model 50 is standard gearing but using 18 inch wheels.

(The pre/fbed Model 50 with a 59 engine in the making will have 19 inch wheels and a 20T gearbox sprocket so I'm expecting even more mpg)

I use a Mk 1 Amal 626 26mm carb with a 210 main jet but no air filter to date. (Till I find it) Plugs are Champion N5 and a lovely colour, always have been.

Most importantly I use E0 petrol, currently ESSO Supreme Synergyy Supreme 97 RON BS 7800. If you have leaded fuel I should use it while you can. lead memory may protect your valve seats for years to come. Mine starts first time so it is in good tune.

My tyres are modern Avon's @ 30psi front and rear. If it makes any odds, oil is SAE 40 topped up with SAE 30 in the colder months.

As David suggests, you need to conduct your tests over a decent period but in different weather and include some longer journeys to give you a fair average. Some say damp weather gives a slightly better MPG but using ethanol will give a lower MPG.

Let us know how you get on please.

Permalink

Worn needle jet and ignition timing are prime suspects. What colour is your plug? I could always tell when I needed a new needle jet when the mpg dropped noticeably. Retarded ignition is bad for mpg, as are binding brakes.

Permalink

I've always been hopeless at accurately recording fuel. I'm trying to do it this year. So far my 16 H gave me only 50 mpg but that was a single tank and for several weeks it was sitting in the garage and perhaps evaporating! I might follow Gordon's advice and get a new needle jet. I do know that I found at least two different ignition times. The more retarted one is in the WD manual and performance was truly dreadful and at that time the bike was a thorough disappointment. But a bit more advance transformed it. After all.. it can always be retarded a little by the lever. Is your 50 manual advance? Pipes may blue quickly if retarded of course.
Permalink

David:

Can you get your friend to post some info about the air filter he fitted to his ES2?

I have been looking for 20 years for an air filter that would fit my Model 50, but no luck.

The spare parts list for all models for 1961/62 lists an air cleaner p/n 18684 for all singles. I have asked before if anyone has information or photos of it and have received no replies.

Anyone out there now?

Mike

Permalink

Mike / David,

I have said before that I have one, just not been able to find it. I hope to do an extensive search this summer and when I find it I will photograph it and post.

I can tell you that the threads are imperial and also fit the Amal 626 that I have on my Model 50.

when I find it, it may be worth having some more made, in stainless?

Permalink

Thanks for the replies.Much appreciated.

the 59 m50 I owned 40yrs ago regularly achieved 75/100mpg depending on my riding style.

My current m50 is jetted as standard but the needle is slightly bent.I straightened it as best as possible and have tried various clip positions but standard is best.

I seldom exceed 50mph but do live in a hilly region often requiring 2nd gear. My journeys are never less than 45miles and I have covered 1000ml this year.

I currently run esso supreme but it's hard to get locally. In fairness I am not worried by the use of unleaded as ethanol was common in fuel when my bike was built.I hate the stuff but we are stuck with it.If the valves go then I will deal with the problem accordingly.

the bike runs a new standard monobloc The brakes do not bind so I suspect the carb as ignition is good and it starts first kick.It will not idle well however and when hot the idle increases then drops so I have to blip it. Whatever I do the plug looks dark.Not sooty but too dark for my liking,however it does not smoke.

Permalink

Maybe slightly rich then John. Are you sure the mixture screw on the carb is set right? Can't think of a lot else. Be very careful not to weaken it too much, you might be surprised just how much influence this has. I am assuming you have a 1" carb fitted, mine is a 26mm so about the same.

Even in your terrain, one would expect at least 60 mpg out of a Model 50 on decent petrol.

Permalink

A bent needle won't be doing the needle jet any good. For all it costs, a new needle and jet would be top of my list. The dark plug does imply running slightly rich - or perhaps some oil burning. Check your advance/retard springs. Could they be weak and not retarding the ignition when the revs drop? THatcould explain the reluctance to idle.

Permalink

Hi John

My 1960 (Slimline) M50 gets about 70mpg most of the time, even when I thrash it ! Plug is slightly rich, I always run on BP ultimate.Like Michael I would be very interested in the air filter Daves friend mentions, it would save modifying my cy head to get carb to line up with existing hole between oil tank and battery box! ( see my previous posts on subject)

At the moment bike is on trailer behind motor home ready for the trip to Italy for rally!.........Very excited......I sail tomorrow from Dover.

Regards John O

Permalink

The said air filter has a very thin pancake, designed to fit between manifold and oil tank without modification.

Permalink

Hi all:

I went out and measured my Model 50. There is only about 7/8" of clearance between the bell mouth and the oil tank. If you remove the bell mouth you will get more clearance, maybe 1-1/8"???

The problem with any type of pancake filter is that with any increase in diameter of the filter, the clearance disappears caused by the angle of the carb mounting. So, to physically fit, the filter would have to be quite small in diameter and short in stack height.

Hopefully, Neil Wyatt will be able to find his old one.

Permalink

It is true that I might benefit from a new needle and jet however the bend was minimal and has been trued to within 5 thou according to the dti on my lathe.

I suspect there is an issue with the carb as the air screw whilst adjusting the quality of response,actually makes no difference to the plug coloud.

After a run the revs are too high and take time to stabilise,suggeztive of a sticking slide(score marks visible) or cable. After a moment tbe revs then reduce but tbe idle is not stable. I have tested the carb joinf for leaks by spraying solvent on it when running but it makes no difference.

Being 17 stone I have to work it quite hard but no harder than I would as a callow youth. Obviously the additional pork does not help!

I am sure I will sort if but thanks for the replies. I see no reason to try a mikuni as amal always worked ok for me in the past. Plus I prefer it to be as original as possible.

Permalink

John, I agree about the carb but Mk 1 626 Amal works for me.

I don't think weight is much of a factor because my Model 50 still gives 78 mpg two up and even with luggage.

Your hills on the other hand will be a factor. Any chance of a test on flatter terrain?

Good Luck.

Permalink

Thanks Neil.

I do not want to go to the expense of another carb but if I have to then so be it. As for flat roads,there are a few but Wales is generally hilly,as are most other areas if I remember correctly.

It is a good bike and getting more use than my others,to the extent I am thinking of selling the w800 and 955 sprint as they are getting no use.

If one of them went I might get Mike P to work his magic on it but do not want to deviate far from standard.If it ran like a 500 it would do,but I am not dissatisfied now.

Permalink

A bit of fiddling today with the ignition.Although set to factory spec I advanced it a touch,listening to the motor until I felt I had gone far enough.

A test run of 87ml resulted in the tank needing 6.51ltr,,I.e. 60mpg.An improvement but it can be better.

it can be quite therapeutic playing with these wonderful old bikes...and frustrating at times!

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans