Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Amal Twin Carb's

Forums

So you have a 99 head with a twin carburettor manifold and you find the carbs have to be Left & Right handed and you have the common ancestor with the float bowl on the left as in all presumably the single-carb variants and you have yet to see a Right-handed float bowled carburettor!

What do you do?

Are twin carbs worth the trouble?

Can Batman Help?

Seriously I have a newly refurbished LH Float bowl carb, where do you find the matching one to have a functioning and easily adjusted pair?

 

Plus look at   the bore/ gasket thickness difference,  on these Carb'both 376/ 1 1/16 th bore/chokes.

Concentric's do not look as nice IMHO!

 

John H

Attachments
Permalink

Can  you then adjust both carburettors  in situation? plus do you put a float bowl extension on the other one?

 

 

 

John H

Permalink

The 99 Model big-valve heads that had the twin carb manifold were usually fitted on the S and SS models were fitted with two standard 376 AMAL Monobloc carbs that had a float chamber on the left-hand side and the adjustment screws on the right.  The 88 Model big-valve heads also used this twin carb manifold primarily on the S, SS and options on others.  When the Semi-downdraught cylinder head was adopted on the 88SS then like its bigger brother 650 the right-hand carb had its float chamber chopped and a link was made between the main jets via a banjo on an extended jet holder at the bottom of the carbs.   For racing, where one float chamber was not considered of sufficient quantity, a carb with a right-hand float chamber was developed but these tended to be in the 389 (689) size ranges.  If you have a 99S or 99SS head then  keep both carbs and occasionally give it a squirt - you'll see why two are better than one......Cheers, H 

Permalink

I had one of those splayed manifolds on my  hotted up 61  88, with two standard 376 carbs ,an SS cam and HC pistons  , It was a pig to get at the carbs  but  kept up with the mates pukka 99SS and 650ss.  A very underated machine the 88SS.  Wish I had it now.

Permalink

Thanks guys, so a chopped Monobloc and a regular Monobloc with chamber extension is the way to go?

 

John

Permalink

If you like John -- But I should only go that way with a semi-downdraught cylinder head.  Make sure that both carbs match the inlet ports .    Cheers, H     

Permalink

My 88SS has the downdraft head. But many years ago on one of the first VMCC Relay Rallies I encountered a chap with one of the earliest few 88SS which had the predowndraft head. (at Aldermaston I think...was it someone here?)

Anyway we met up on the road. He sat bolt upright and his bike definitely had better legs than mine! Plumstead Norton changed camshafts at about the same time as cylinder heads  and I wonder if by making two changes at the same time they obscured the fact that the new cam made more difference than the new head?

Permalink

Many people did swear by the SS camshaft stamped with X1 ( a hardness rating ).  The X2 cam that was fitted at Plumstead  did wear out quickly even though the hardness was deeper ??  Cheers, Howard

Permalink

... a finned float extension in my pile of Amal bits if it's any use to you?

Permalink

Standard Monobloc carbs were used as twin carbs on the 99 up to 1959 as I have one.  I have a post elsewhere with more detail, but handed Monos weren't made then.  They had a splayed twin inlet manifold to accommodate the float chambers.  The Norton Parts List for 1959 has twin carbs in the "Optional Equipment section in red type at the back.  You needed two Part No. 22113.

Permalink

New ones can be obtained from Burlen. I had a pair for a twin monobloc Atlas a while ago. I did have to add my own float bowl extension from the old pair.

Permalink

To me, they are in the same group of bits as finned rocker covers - Items in the 'go faster goodies' section that don't actually do anything useful.

I've never had nor wanted an extension on my 650, and it still runs happily up at the top end, no sign of fuel starvation. They were never fitted as standard to any bike, even to Atlases which had way bigger main jets than the smaller bikes in the range.

Just saying..

 

Regards,

George

 

 

 

Logical that the 99SS seems to have had the same spec as the "Special" options in 1959.  Two standard carbs then?  I can't remember when they brought out the chopped version.  Didn't they produce left and right-handed Monoblocs once?  There are still splayed manifolds available machined from billet.

As to the float chamber extensions - it was THE thing to have a bit of Bling in the mid-60s!  I fitted a blue anodised extension to my single Monobloc - it definitely went MUCH faster!  NOT!

I'm more interested in finding the original air filter, available as an optional extra in 1959 (and probably other years too - I haven't checked my Parts Lists) , or at least a photo of one. It fitted on the studs at the back of the oil tank and behind the steel panel, which bridged the gap between oil tank and battery box.  Stupidly, one of the first things I did was to cut it off!  Well - I was only 18!  Luckily I found a cheap replacement at Kempton Park complete with the infill panel.  I think I have two spare oil tanks now!  The advantage of buying and rescuing/restoring bits is that, at the end of the day, you can always sell your surplus at a decent price as there is always a demand.

 

Permalink

The Box filter that lives between the oil tank and battery is (or was) availiable from Norville . I have one on my 99.  Its not a very impressive thing needing a bit of re-shaping to fit. A ring on the carb accepts a rubber connector (a bit too loose) that connects to the box. The filter can be constructed from half an Austin Mini filter with some mastic to seal. The box needs painting. Its a very tight fit to the outer flange of the oil tank . 

Thanks Robert (I'm guessing yours was a reply to mine?).  Norvil (Not "Norville" - that must be in France!)  list filter housings for various models but have no photos.  I wouldn't risk buying something I can't see.  I imagine they are almost impossible to access once installed, and very difficult to install if the battery box and oil tank are in position.

Just to be clear, I'm talking about the type with the centre panel welded to the inside edge of the oil tank. I've pinched a photo from eBay as mine are buried in the workshop! 

Attachments
Permalink

I certainly remember fitting a pair of matched 389/689 to a 650SS in the 1960s.  I don't think that there was ever a matching 676 variety with right-hand float. They did make a difference flat-out on the back straight at Aintree.   Cheers, Howard 

Thanks Howard.  I have removed my previous post once I realised I was wrong - it was a left hand on sale, not right!  Silly me!

Norvil make references to right-hand carbs in their lists so I'm pretty sure they were produced some time in the late 1960s or early 70s.  Along with Hen's Teeth I suspect.

Permalink

The box filter bolts to the back of the oil tank using the threads already there. It would be impossible to fit with the battery box in position.   Having used both Monoblocks and concentrics I view the mono's as superior in all respects.

Permalink

Did you mean a monobollock with the floatbowl on the right? There were a left/right pair on ebay recently. Didn't Triumph use them at one time? As for a chopped 376 as per 650SS, have a look at:

http://amalcarb.co.uk/monobloc-series/376-series/base-line-specifications/chopped-1-1-16in-monobloc-carburettor.html

Not good news for Atlas owners though - the chopped 389 isn't listed anymore.

Worst thing re: twin carbs (pre-concentric ones) is accessing the air adjuster screw on the left carb.

As for my comment earlier regarding the float bowl extension, I see Amal have 2 types available - one plain and one finned for even more speed!

Regards,

George

 

Permalink

The 389LH/689RH were for the most part 1966 only. Approximately 150+/- models of 389 and only about 15 LH/RH sets, of which a few were for atlas and the hybrids.  BSA A65.....etc.

around 1967 started concentrics

Dave

63 Atlas

66 Atlas 389/689

68 Dunstall Atlas

Permalink

Simply put monoblocks flow more air for a given size wrt concentrics, and they didn't wear out so fast.

George

Permalink

Thank you George, I just bought a newly refurbished 376/67 for it said a 77 /99 but the spec' tells me the slide is 3, rather than 3 1/2 ummh!

I prefer the look of monblocs and funnily enough I don't like the aesthetic look of the down draught carbs it doesn't look right somehow!

 

 

John

 

 

Permalink

make a 3 slide into a 3 1/2 by filing 1/32" from the cutaway.

My understanding is that each whole number is equal to 1/16". Easy to check with your new slides - is the cutaway height 3/16"?

I would suggest caution however - the suggested carb specs/settings given for 50 - 60 year old bikes were for the fuel used 50 - 60 years ago, not the stuff we are using nowadays, so you may well find that you will need to adjust/change settings to make it run right, more so as from your other posts you are possibly building a 'mongrel'.

Regards,

George

Permalink

You can file the bottom of a slide to make a 3 from a 31/2 but it needs to be done well. The needle position will also change. Monos last better (with a chromed slide) they are easier to access the jets at the roadside and the single carb float. Look better,  Are more original on most Dommies.

Permalink

I used to race on a single carb 88 and did ok. I'm not convinced that twin carbs are a real benefit - except possibly at full throttle above 7,000 rpm.

The Altas engine in my Domi 99 came with handed 389 carbs. I promptly opted for a single carb manifold as I am too idle to faff around with adjusting 2 carbs and throttle cables. It still goes rather well which is fine by me. And I have a spare carb ready to fit should I need it.   

Looks neat your 650 Anthony, I suppose Chopped Monoblocs allow the carb's to be mounted  perpendicular to the engine. I thought at first that the Chopped style came in to allow tuning in situation!

 

 

John

In reply to by george_farenden

Permalink

A " Mongrel " George, more like a Metisse, I think the change to "modern" fuels was partially/probably a strategy to get old petrol vehicles off the road, FHBVC seemed very quiet about it and ethanol does seem to be a damaging product to fuel systems. Meanwhile on the World markets water is becoming a "Commodity" with increasing value!

But then it is a crazy World, I understand, how matching numbers work and how often ironically value is assigned , but as Anna has said on many occasion to me, you could pay top dollar for a bike with matching unmbersand still be no wiser about the engines internal condition, except through the word of the previous owner and build receipts..but even then?

I think a lot of old bikes problems are brought about by inadequate oil pressure and poor filtration systems, especially air, oil and even maybe petrol filters are needed from corroding tanks.

AS soon as car-type filtration systems were fitted to bikes reliability, engine life went up, I once read an article about how long it took grit to ruin an engine, and it was an incredible short space of time.

That's why I am always amazed at the Paris-Dakar type events!

Plus both the Allies and Axis armies soon learned about the need for filtration in North Africa, during World War Two!

 

 John

Permalink

Huricanes in North Africa had field-made air filters fitted using sanitary pads. There was chaos when supplies of pads were stopped as someone back at home saw that there were no WAAFs in North Africa so stopped sending pads. Hurricanes were eventually fitted with proper Vokes filters...

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans