Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

500 twin crank survey

Forums

Hi,
if anyone's got a 500 twin crank in bits would you be able to measure the oilways inside the crank? should be either 1", 7/8" or 5/8". It would be good to know if it's a dynamo crank, alternator crank,SS crank....
trying to understand if there is an error in the dominator service notes.
thanks,
pete

Permalink

I have two 500cc alternator cranks apart at present.

The internal oilways are:
Std Model 88:  1 inch
88SS:   5/8 inch.

Permalink

Yes they are both alternator cranks as initially mentioned 

In reply to by ian_richtsteig

Permalink

(Sorry missed that!)

Permalink

I could find a spare dynamo crank and check it as well if that helps.

Permalink

No problem just take me a few days.

Permalink

Hi Ashley - there must have been a drawing amendment for the 88SS and also for the alternator version of the crankshaft so was there an amendment for a 7/8 inch journal ?  Cheers, Howard

Permalink

Its well known  that older cranks are more suseptible to fracture due to the larger core  hole together with an  internal stress raiser ,and genuine later  88 SS cranks are a better bet with a smaller core hole .  These are old motors and the fabled 88ss cranks are not easy to find . If looking for reliable performance I would think 650 SS.

Permalink

Hello Pete,  As one of the contributors to assemble the Dominator Service Notes publication I have been looking for evidence of the mysterious 7/8 inch big-end journal hole on Dominator 500 and 600 crankshafts.  Only this morning I was reminded that all Nortons in the Bracebridge St era were virtually hand built and assembled as far as possible to  the customer's wishes.  Hence all manner of frame parts, gearbox ratios and engine-tune parts could be specified and Norton were keen to oblige.  When the factory closed the experimental department and the race shop many hitherto unseen components became available and crankshafts with all manner of different dimensions came to the market place particularly in the racing fraternity.  Crankshafts with 1/2 inch holes and 1.75 inch big-end journals (using Matchless big-end shells and con-rods).  Also 5/8 inch holes with 1.6 inch shells and - dare I say ?....Triumph rods were purchased.   So if a bike was intended as a private entry to Daytona, Sebring , Mosport or Thruxton all manner of different specifications were possible and likely.  Needless to say these modifications did not get included in revised Drawing sets or Parts books.  Some of you lucky readers will have owned a genuine 88SS.   These engines had a 5/8 inch hole in a 1.5 inch big-end but some of these crankshafts found their way into some of the later 88 Standard and De-Luxe models.  I personally had a 1962 88SS that had a semi-downdraught head with 28 mm inlet ports and no tin tube.  Most of these models had 1 1/8 inch inlet ports and a tin insert sleeve to reduce the port to 1 1/16 inch to match the 376 Amal Monobloc carburettor.   So, to me it is unsurprising that a rogue crankshaft may occasionally turn up ( from an ex-race engine) but searching for the evidence may be impossible.  My "head" too could have been a rogue but I hope it is still performing on an unsuspecting 88SS rider's steed.   Good Luck  Pete - buy an alternator crank with 5/8 inch hole.       Howard

Permalink

Thanks all. So I understand the issue with the cranks but would like to get to the bottom of whether or not there is a good number of 7/8" oilway 88 cranks out there.
The reason for this is that the service notes seemed to lead me on a wild goose when I looked for an 88 crank with the 7/8" oilways having discovered that mine had the 1" oilways. According to the Dominator service notes only the early model 7 dynamo engines had this type of crank and it was superseded with a 7/8" version. I believed from this that I should be able to replace the crank with the later 7/8" version and rang round a few suppliers, asking them to measure the oilways. They drew a blank on the 7/8" cranks, only having the 1" cranks. One was totally baffled and got quite annoyed!
id like to get this put to bed and the service notes updated so no one else new to nortons goes through the same.
I've also asked the question on accessnorton and so far the only standard 88 cranks mentioned have 1" oilways, both dynamo and alternator. Someone has the 5/8" SS crank (nos!). So far it's shaping up to show that for all intents and purposes the 7/8" cranks should be disregarded and I think it would be only fair to reflect this in the service notes.

Permalink

It would make sense variations are out there, even back in the old days there would have been a MOQ for someone to machine and I suspect the race shop may have had an initial requirement of say 20 cranks, so ordered 20. However they may have only built 5 bikes and I doubt back then the extra cranks would have been wasted and used on road going models. Just like we often see Atlas crank drive ends on 750 Commando cranks. It no longer amazes me what turns up where, we see it all the time. 

Permalink

I got 5 responses between here and access Norton. I've added the two cranks I have to give a total of 7.

SS with 5/8" oilway: 2
standard 88 alternator or dynamo 7/8" oilway: 0
standard 88 alternator or dynamo 1" oilway: 5

one of the 1" results was a crank in a race bike.

 



© 2024 Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans