Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Commando frame tubing

Forums

Can anyone advise on frame tubing as used on my June 1972 manufacture 750 Combat Roadster ?

I have discovered some rust perforation on the bottom of the left side frame loop just behind the side stand mount and will need to look at having a new piece welded in . Thanks - Richard

Permalink

Andover Norton stock all frame parts to replace rusted/damaged bits.

01264 359565 ask for Ashley or Simon.

Norman White on Thruxton Industrial Estate 01264 773326 is a well-known Norton racing man and an expert frame builder if you need someone to do the work.

Phil

Permalink

Mild steel, nothing special, as Phillip says AN do the frame in all its individual parts for replacement. You do not want a weakened section of frame next to the sidestand mount.

Permalink

Thanks gents - Would love to haveNorman White do the work but I am in the USA .

Only discovered bad spot yesterday after washing road grime off frame- this project is now progressing after sitting for 5 years . I need to strip the paint in the area in question to make a better assessment and hope to be able to weld in a patch . The area in question is in a straight section.

i will be getting shipping quotes from Andover and others on a new frame to cover a worst case scenario.

Thanks again - Richard

Permalink

So I have come to think that it may be best to purchase a new frame . A little history here - I had just begun to tear down my 1972 Combat Roadster nearly six years ago . I built new SS wheels , sleeved the master cylinder, drilled the Lockheed brake rotor and had it Blanchard ground. I had previously gone through the gearbox - bearings , bushes etc .

I live at the seashore and we were hit by Superstorm Sandy - we had to evacuate ( once again ! ) and simply ran out of time to do all the preparations that needed doing . I had only one large lift at the time so my recently completed ES2 went on that - the Commando ( less wheels thankfully) went on an ATV jack - not as high as the lift but it was the best option at hand.

When we were able to return ( 10 days later ? ) I found the ES2 fine but the Commando had been immersed in salt water halfway up the timing chest. A meticulous rinsing /wash in freshwater followed along wth pulling drains in crankcase and gearbox - only oil came out so I was confident that no water had gotten to the internals and my recent disassembly has born that out thankfully but the chassis is another story .

Life got in the way for a bit and I was able to resume work on the Commando exactly 5 years later to the day from our evacuation . I stripped the chassis down and discovered some rust penetration along the bottom of the left side frame loop in the area immediately behind the tab for the side stand . I now believe there may have been some weld perforation from the welding of the tab and this may have allowed salt water to enter the tubing and do it's dirty work.

I planned to patch and cut the tube axialy so as not to require jigging . When all seemed good I realized the corrosion had nearly penetrated the tube along its entire bottom length.

Attachments
image-jpg

Permalink

And this showing the depth of corrosion -

I am looking at a frame from AN - It seems the others require 850 yokes while Andover claims theirs will accept my 750 units. Do I gather that these two offerings have different headstock angles and hence the need for different yokes for rake/trail considerations ?

Any input from those more knowledgeable than I would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance to all - Richard

Attachments
image-jpg

Permalink

The head angle is different, you could fit 750 yokes to a 850 frame but not the other way round. Looking at you pics I would be using AN repair pieces ie the complete lower rail, not the whole frame but I have access to a good welder.

Corrected

Permalink

Thanks John - I have a very good welder that I have great confidence in - I thought of using the entire loop repair piece but now we would be getting into jigging the frame and I would always have concerns about the internal condition of the other side .

Permalink

Permalink

If this were in Industry, we'd be doing an ultrasound thickness check on the other side. Non-invasive and quick, and should not be too difficult for plane tubing. It gets to be very clever when used to check welded fabrications when different angles of projection are used, and the operator must interpret signals being bounced back from strange places. But it's dead simple for thin steel where the first bounce comes from the back of the plate. You can hire the kit. I see one firm charges £50 per week. Probably less in the US! And just think of all the other places you could test (and then worry about!)

Permalink

The critical dimension on the loop is the position of the front and rear iso mount brackets, if you get that right there is not much else to worry about. So you refurb your front and rear iso's but initially set with zero clearance, reinstall the crankcases with the engine/gearbox cradle with both iso's bolted up to the right hand side, offer up the left side rail and bolt it to the iso's and weld where required. In effect the engine and iso's act as the jig using zero clearance to make sure its all lined up correctly, you could go further and add the barrel, head and head steady too.

Permalink

Previously john_holmes wrote:

The head angle is different, you could fit 850 yokes to a 750 frame but not the other way round. Looking at you pics I would be using AN repair pieces ie the complete lower rail, not the whole frame but I have access to a good welder.

You have this around the wrong way

You can use the 750 parallel yokes on an 850 frame but not the 850 yokes on a 750 frame,

The 850 (ang) yokes are de raked by one degree ,

The 750 frame has a 27? rake the 850 has a 28? rake

Permalink

Corrected Nicholas. The 850 yokes in the 750 frame reduce the trail hence will make it more unstable, 750 yokes in an 850 frame will increase the trail and increase the stability.

Permalink

Previously David Cooper wrote:

If this were in Industry, we'd be doing an ultrasound thickness check on the other side. Non-invasive and quick, and should not be too difficult for plane tubing. It gets to be very clever when used to check welded fabrications when different angles of projection are used, and the operator must interpret signals being bounced back from strange places. But it's dead simple for thin steel where the first bounce comes from the back of the plate. You can hire the kit. I see one firm charges £50 per week. Probably less in the US! And just think of all the other places you could test (and then worry about!)

What about the Tinsley pencil?

Attachments
Tinsley%20Pencil.png

Permalink

Previously David Cooper wrote:

If this were in Industry, we'd be doing an ultrasound thickness check on the other side. Non-invasive and quick, and should not be too difficult for plane tubing. It gets to be very clever when used to check welded fabrications when different angles of projection are used, and the operator must interpret signals being bounced back from strange places. But it's dead simple for thin steel where the first bounce comes from the back of the plate. You can hire the kit. I see one firm charges £50 per week. Probably less in the US! And just think of all the other places you could test (and then worry about!)

You could also drill an 1/8"hole to see the thickness and then weld it back up!

Permalink

Thanks to all for the helpful advice. I have ordered up a new frame from AN - given the advanced state of corrosion from the inside out of the left frame loop I would always be concerned about the right loop and front lower crossmember - as this component has a hole for the side stand spring it most certainly had saltwater enter it . The cost of the new frame including shipping to USA is offset to some degree by the repair and paint cost were I to repair original. I would hate to have to tear it all down again in a few years to deal with more rust issues - by that time I will be 70 yrs old so the smart money seems to be on the new frame . I will post comments on the shipping time and process when I receive it for those who may be curious.

Cheers - Richard

Permalink

The new frame from AN has arrived in very good order indeed . The ordering process was completed on July 6 . I received notice from the shipper DHL that delivery would be on Wednesday July 11 but as I had to be out of town on that date I took the reschedule option for Monday the 16 . Something went amiss but I did receive it today -Tuesday the 17th. It was very well packed and I am very pleased . Had I not rescheduled the total time from order to my door would have been less than one week - all the way across the pond for something as big as a motorcycle frame so a tip of the hat to all involved.

cheers - Richard

Permalink

Mike - I assume you meant the new frame - as can be seen the frame itself is completely wrapped in bubble wrap. It arrived in a heavy gauge cardboard box sealed with packing tape and multiple bands of plastic webbing in both directions and saddled at all corners . All voids around the frame were filled with close fitting empty cardboard boxes.

Attachments
image-jpg

Permalink

And this - a very rich and nicely done paint finish in black-if wanted I will post more photos when I unwrap completely.

Richard

Attachments
image-jpg

 



© 2024 Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans