Skip to main content
English French German Italian Spanish

Silencers for the Heavy Twins

Forums

Hello every one Well its come to my attention that there are Not enough information on Heavy twin Silencers we do know that the early model 88 and 99 had the whats know as the pear-drop style with seams top and bottom of the silencer then from September 1956 there was the smooth look silencer as it was called that the time but these had no seams or folds just a weld on the under side, mounted on two 5/16 bolt holes threaded in to the silencer for the bracket to mount to the passenger foot rest . then in September 1959 the All New Look Slimline Norton came out in De-luxe or Standard Models and there had a new style silencer Known as the Cigar Style as they looked like a long cigar these had no seams at all and mounted in the same way.as before. But For The Norton Manxman it's Silencers were very different indeed as theses were only 24 inches long and fat and had seams down both side and mounted with a long welded plate shaped on top of the silencer these mounted to the passenger foot rests but the left hand side as a 1 inch spacer so the silencer dose not hit the back plate. and these were made in house at Norton works Bracebridge street by there crafts-men , So I hope its bit of information may help someone or may not as the case maybe. yours Anna J

Attachments picture-126-jpg
Permalink

Previously anna jeannette Dixon wrote:

Hello every one Well its come to my attention that there are Not enough information on Heavy twin Silencers we do know that the early model 88 and 99 had the whats know as the pear-drop style with seams top and bottom of the silencer then from September 1956 there was the smooth look silencer as it was called that the time but these had no seams or folds just a weld on the under side, mounted on two 5/16 bolt holes threaded in to the silencer for the bracket to mount to the passenger foot rest . then in September 1959 the All New Look Slimline Norton came out in De-luxe or Standard Models and there had a new style silencer Known as the Cigar Style as they looked like a long cigar these had no seams at all and mounted in the same way.as before. But For The Norton Manxman it's Silencers were very different indeed as theses were only 24 inches long and fat and had seams down both side and mounted with a long welded plate shaped on top of the silencer these mounted to the passenger foot rests but the left hand side as a 1 inch spacer so the silencer dose not hit the back plate. and these were made in house at Norton works Bracebridge street by there crafts-men , So I hope its bit of information may help someone or may not as the case maybe. yours Anna J

Thanks Anna.

All information gratefully received.

Cheers Mick

Permalink

When I was doing the first re-build of my ex Pride & Clarke 1959 '99' in 1965, John Hudson told me thatmy 'Special' (Twin carbs, polished & larger inlet valves) was found to perform better with siamesed pipes and a "Sports Silencer". I never did find out what one of these was. I must take a look in my old parts lists when I can be bothered, but clearly the implication was that another type of silencer was available.

Cheers, Lionel

Permalink

Just reading this thread today when I got back my rechromed 99SS silencer after 4 months away at the re-chromer. I was given this silencer, along with small bore siamese pipes and the original 99SS engine with my ComDom in 1979, so I think it is the original 1961 99SS item. it is exactly 25 inches long, and has a long welded and ground seam along the underside (see photo) . Internally there is a disk at the outlet end with a small central hole through which you can see all the way along the silencer. Remains to be seen how crisp (or not) the exhaust is in action.

Vic Willoughby's 'The Motor Cycle' 1961 road test attributes most of the extra performance of the SS to the siamese pipes and silencer, and you have to agree that it is strange that if the siamese setup is so much more powerful (and you would think cheaper to produce) it was only offered as no-cost option. I don't have my parts book with me, but I think it is a different part from the RH standard Dommi part. In the first edition he says that this siamese setup is the only reason the 99SS has the same maximum power as the Manxman but retains more useful torque lower down the rev range.

You can only imagine what a Manxman with a siamese exhaust might have gone like, Norton probably suppressed it on public safety grounds.

Steve

Attachments composite-jpg
Permalink

Hmmm ComDom: sounds like a safe bike........

My 650ss with a knocking motor and 99 head, yet produces fantastic performance with a single carb but alsothe 2-1 system. Maybe there is something in it. Will be some machine (64 bottom end) if I ever get to fix it,

Talking of pipes for the record: Armours tell me they have Dommie down pipes in Stainless but only Chrome silencers.

On closing, I understand that someone put a Morini V twin engine in a Norton frame. Guess what they called it?

Permalink

Armours made me up some chrome small bore siamese pipes about 6 months ago, and they look really good. I had to provide the exhaust ring to them in advance for the RH pot, as it is captive.

Was it a Morton or a Norini?

Permalink

I've had siamezed pipes from Armour on the 88SS for about 8 years. Two issues: one is that the chrome plating process cannot cover inside re-entrant corners as well as elsewhere so the plating is deteriorating slightly there. The other is that where the side pipe is welded onto the main pipe there's some of the main pipe left to obstruct the entrance hole. I've done my best to file it away - it isn't very accessible - but it must detract from gas flow.They fitted perfectly to the downdraft head.They did not have s/s in stock at that time.
Permalink

I rather suspect that the siamese pipes made little difference really, or why were they not made standard? BTW did Norton ever supply small bore siamese pipes for downdraught head models?

Permalink

Interesting question..officially only the first 100 or so 88SS had the earlier head so if only some of them had siamesed pipes they would be very rare. The machine with siamesed pipes tested by 'Motor Cycling' in May 1961 appears to have the earlier head - and was a lot quicker than mine.That makes me wonder if the down-draft head was any better anyway? Maybe the more constricted earlier had had more 'swirl'? Those were days of unnecessarily polished input ports...I can't tell much difference when I swap back and fore but then it's not been timed on a track. I get the slight impression of more vibration with siamesed - maybe because of the slight restriction in one pipe?There is a slight weight saving and the mechanics are a bit more accessible. But 2 pipes look better to most people.
Permalink

I think you will find the performance figures, given by nearly all motorcycle magazines, are optimistic. Ususallly the rider is a skinny 10 stone in weight, and wears skin tight leathers!

Permalink

Previously steve_marshall wrote:

Just reading this thread today when I got back my re chromed 99SS silencer after 4 months away at the re-chrome. I was given this silencer, along with small bore Siamese pipes and the original 99SS engine with my Com-Dom in 1979, so I think it is the original 1961 99SS item. it is exactly 25 inches long, and has a long welded and ground seam along the underside (see photo) . Internally there is a disk at the outlet end with a small central hole through which you can see all the way along the silencer. Remains to be seen how crisp (or not) the exhaust is in action.

Vic Willoughby's 'The Motor Cycle' 1961 road test attributes most of the extra performance of the SS to the Siamese pipes and silencer, and you have to agree that it is strange that if the Siamese setup is so much more powerful (and you would think cheaper to produce) it was only offered as no-cost option. I don't have my parts book with me, but I think it is a different part from the RH standard Dommi part. In the first edition he says that this Siamese setup is the only reason the 99SS has the same maximum power as the Manxman but retains more useful torque lower down the rev range.

You can only imagine what a Manxman with a Siamese exhaust might have gone like, Norton probably suppressed it on public safety grounds.

Steve

well how do you make out the (99SS) as the same power as a 650 Norton Manxman when the (99ss) had 43bhp , and the Norton Manxman has 52bhp I think there a big difference in the power out put, don't you, and it was only some of the 99SS had 2 in to 1 pipes this was just a marketing trick.

Permalink

Previously neil_wyatt wrote:

Hmmm ComDom: sounds like a safe bike........

My 650ss with a knocking motor and 99 head, yet produces fantastic performance with a single carb but alsothe 2-1 system. Maybe there is something in it. Will be some machine (64 bottom end) if I ever get to fix it,

Talking of pipes for the record: Armours tell me they have Dommie down pipes in Stainless but only Chrome silencers.

On closing, I understand that someone put a Morini V twin engine in a Norton frame. Guess what they called it?

well there the ones that started all this silencer and exhaust pipe mess in the first place, with making the Wrong type of silencer and exhaust pipes the bends are wrong on the exhaust pipes and the silencer have big seam on the under side , wear the original did not have a seam there were welded seam , and the cone end is not right as well , and the baffles are not the right type so you get poor performance, this all to do with back pressure in the exhaust system, this over time leads to poor carburation and unburnt fuel and sooty exhausts and carbon build up on your valves and pistons , too get the right carburation take off the exhaust and run the bike with out them on , and you then see the colour of the flame patents , get the right colour of flame a nice mid blue , then your going places , this is how broad tack racers tuned there bikes in the mid 1920s this just like your car if you put a poor exhaust on it it will not perform its just like sticking a potato up the tail pipe, yours anna j

Permalink

Don't see a lot of point in checking the mixture without an exhaust system in place. Overall length of the exhaust, baffling system (if any), type and shape of silencer, are all going to affect carburettion..

Permalink

I agree with Anna, the exhaust off the check the flame colour is a common practice although you have to be careful not to burn your eyebrows off whilst checking. And off course the right exhaust is a must. But for a fair check on carb tune i always go with plug colour. to get the right balanceI pull a lead off one side start the bike set and then repeat on the other side but i guess you all knew that already.Now of course having been disloyal to the cause and fitted a single jap carb life is less complicated. Mark

Permalink

Isn't the Gunsons Colortune plug the way forward to observe the flame colour running the engine with with yer actual silencer fitted? Available at £27.10 from all good eBays.

Anna - I have to say I was a little disappointed with your restrained response to my risible 99SS/Manxman power claim.

Steve

Permalink

Previously steve_marshall wrote:

Isn't the Gunsons Colortune plug the way forward to observe the flame colour running the engine with with yer actual silencer fitted? Available at £27.10 from all good eBays.

Anna - I have to say I was a little disappointed with your restrained response to my risible 99SS/Manxman power claim.

Steve

Well since I had a (99SS) and Now a Norton Manxman 650 , I would know, and there both very good motorcycles in there own way, and at lest they both have the legendary featherbed slimline frame and you cannot argue with that, can you, happy Christmas

Permalink

Previously neil_wyatt wrote:

A Jap carb? No street cred there...........sad

British carbs for British bikes.

well how about senspray carburettors or Gardner carburettors or wal-phillips or almac are these any good for you,

Permalink

The parts book says

22790 Silencer L or R 88, 99 Std and D/L

23767 Silencer RH 650 Std and D/L

The SUPPLEMENTARY LIST for 1961/62 Models 88ss, 99ss and 650ss says:

23767 Silencer, R.H. (for exhaust pipe 24021) 1962 88ss and 650ss

and 23767 Silencer (for Siamese Pipes 23830/1) 1961 88ss; 61/62 99ss.

So it looks like all 650's and all SS's (88,99,650) had the same RH silencer, with or without the siamese pipes. Norton only made two options.

Permalink

The performance gain with small bore siamese pipes is more likely to have been because of the small bore maintaining the exhaust gas speed out of the system. If the port and/or pipe diameter is too big then the gas slows down, eddies form at any bends in the pipe and in the worst case gas starts to flow back into the cylinder, which does for cylinder filling and volumetric efficiency. Look at later Commandos and the (Meriden) Thruxton Bonnevilles - 1 3/8" diameter pipes, compared with earlier models.

I read an article by Royce Creasy years ago . He had a Velocette Clubman Venom that rarely started and never ticked over. In desparation he took a hacksaw to the top bend of the exhaust pipe, made a cut on the underside and knocked the metal up to form a sort of dam . He then brazed in a piece of plate to seal the hole. Outcome was, the Velo' started with a couple of kicks and ticked over. Bears thinking about.

Permalink

Previously steve_marshall wrote:

Armours made me up some chrome small bore siamese pipes about 6 months ago, and they look really good. I had to provide the exhaust ring to them in advance for the RH pot, as it is captive.

Was it a Morton or a Norini?

Armours have made Nothing They use other suppliers or exhaust makers to make up something special. they have no tooling, these are the real facts . and most of there exhausts are copies of some else after market copy . most Triumph and BSA exhaust are easy to get . as a most AJS and Matchless /and Commando but when it comes to dominator they failed there is NO Folded seam on bottom of the Original dominator silencers from 1956 to 1970 but there is a welded seam running down the length of the bottom . them chromed over

You see in photo 681 the silencer on the right its the original one and the one on the left is a after market one with a folded seam on the bottom , note the original one is a welded seam and have a more rounded cone end . yours anna J

Attachments picture-681-jpg
Permalink

Previously steve_marshall wrote:

The parts book says

22790 Silencer L or R 88, 99 Std and D/L

23767 Silencer RH 650 Std and D/L

The SUPPLEMENTARY LIST for 1961/62 Models 88ss, 99ss and 650ss says:

23767 Silencer, R.H. (for exhaust pipe 24021) 1962 88ss and 650ss

and 23767 Silencer (for Siamese Pipes 23830/1) 1961 88ss; 61/62 99ss.

So it looks like all 650's and all SS's (88,99,650) had the same RH silencer, with or without the siamese pipes. Norton only made two options.

Well your parts book will not say is parts numbers 23174 RH and 23437LH these are the Manxman silencers very special made just for the Norton manxman only. and there very hard to get your hand on them. no one has ever made any for the after market . there is only the originals hand made by bracebridge street craftsmen .

AS you see in this picture 273 the original silencer for the right hand side that just come from Quality chrome in Kingston upon Hull after re-chroming at a cost of £160 there work is very good with a very thick lair of chrome on its silencer they remove all the old chrome first and them polish it up for the nickel bath its first nickel plated for 2 hours in that bath then it gone back to the polisher for the next stage then on the the chroming bath were it spends 3 hours in there to get a real nice thick lair of nickel chrome on then back to the polisher for the final polish a lot of work for one silencer thats what you pays your money for good quality work and long lasting too. there top men in there trade . I have seen them do this work as spent time with them doing this type of quality workmanship , and quality chrome as never lost even a washer or nut. or screw and there the only ones in this area that can do real Gold plating using real gold in there process. yes someone as had there Lambrettor parts Gold plated and engraved the art work is just out of this world. just take a look on there web site. well were going of topic yet again . but its in my story on chroming a silencer. these silencer are from Sweden from a good Friend how i will always be indeted to him. he has his own norton museum.

Attachments picture-273-jpg

 


Norton Owners Club Website by 2Toucans