There are a number of modifications to the clutch pushrod mechanism to prevent oil coming from the gearbox into the clutch basket. As my commando is standard, the clutch runs in oil anyway.
so my questions are.
1. Does gearbox oil affect clutch plates in some magic way that primary drive oil does not?
2. For those that have a belt drive and thus run the chaincase dry (obviously not 850 MkIII's) do you get a problem with oil contamination coming along the pushrod?
your thoughts...
I'd be interested in answers…
- Log in to post comments
Hi Stan, I had the same…
Hi Stan,
I had the same problem with clutch slip. Solved by modifying the plates in the same way as the RGM hi torque ones, reduces the contact area by about half, plus using ATF in the primary.
hopefully we will get a good number of responses from those running belt drives.
Tony
- Log in to post comments
The subject has been covered…
The subject has been covered extensively over many years:
https://www.nortonownersclub.org/support/technical-support-commando/clutch
and, of course, Mr Leadbeter's exposition on the shortcomings of the clutch itself:
https://www.nortonownersclub.org/comment/16032#comment-16032
But, having read these articles, I'm still trying to understand why I never, ever suffered from clutch slip when using my Commando regularly in the 70s. And the several Commando owners I knew never complained about their clutches either. Yet now, using the exact same parts, it can be truly awful. Yes, the parts are half a century old but they've just been in a box on the shelf for 40 years.
Things that are different are: oils and time spent parked. Is that it?
- Log in to post comments
Hi, Thanks for details about…
Hi,
Thanks for details about slipping clutches. But PLEASE could responders read what the question actually asks.
I am interested if those who run a dry primary, have issues with oil coming down the pushrod tube and contaminating the clutch plates.
If not, then why are there methods suggested to prevent this happening?
If so, then I will know that it does happen, and then try to decide if it is actually a problem.
Tony
- Log in to post comments
As noted, I never saw any…
As noted, I never saw any oil on the plates running a dry clutch and belt drive on a race bike so I'm as mystified as you to whether clutch pushrods seals are a panacea or snake oil.
The link to the NOC compendium on the clutch does offer suggestions on how oil might get onto and down the pushrod but also how this can't happen. There was a trace of oil on my bronze plates before I swapped them out this year, but the usual smell test didn't identify gear oil. I suppose one could add a dye to the gearbox oil and look for it in the clutch.
- Log in to post comments
To answer the question on…
To answer the question on the Gearbox oil, it usually contains extreme pressure additives that could affect the clutch plates more than other oils.
I don't use the side stand and don't get gearbox oil in the in the clutch.
My clutch used to slip but on the first aggressive overtake of the day, after that it would be fine all day.
If you fit Barnett plates then they should work fine in oil as they are designed to run in oil but will also run dry.
Most race bikes with belt drives most probably don't experience this much as they are usually on paddock stands and thus upright.
- Log in to post comments
I'd be interested in answers to those questions too.
The standard bronze clutch on my Mk3 slipped badly at about 5,000 rpm - dangerous if passing a line of cars in 3rd. Cleaning helped for a few miles but it kept coming back. I've fitted the RGM pushrod seal and changed to Surflex fibre plates and changed from a semi-synth car oil to a 20/50 4T specified for wet clutches. Seems to have worked. But having changed three things I don't know which has had most effect.
I would note:
So is it that modern oils are much "slippier" or infrequent use, with the bike parked on the side-stand for days/weeks, allows the oil (primary or gearbox) to permeate the clutch where previously it was flung off? Or something else?