Navigation

You are here: Home / Messages / Nortons - General / BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:


This message board is a technical forum for Nortons in general. Club related and non-technical items should be put in News and Views and if posted here, will be deleted

BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Up to Nortons - General

BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at August 12. 2017

Hi,

Does anyone know whether the later 8" BSA/ Triumph Conical Hub Twin Leading shoe brake plate unit and shoes, can be adapted for a Dominator full width 8" drum?

 

Cheers

 

 

John

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by Bruce Mitchell at August 18. 2017

Previously john_hall1 wrote:

Hi,

Does anyone know whether the later 8" BSA/ Triumph Conical Hub Twin Leading shoe brake plate unit and shoes, can be adapted for a Dominator full width 8" drum?

 

Cheers

 

 

John

 

I have a brake from a 1968 to 1970 Triumph/BSA on my 99.  I've asked the fellow who made the mod if the conical one could be fitted as well.  He fit one to his RE Interceptor.  I'll let you know.

Bruce

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by Bruce Mitchell at August 25. 2017

Unfortunately he is currently too busy to provide much of an answer but it doesn't sound good.

 

"I've looked at using the conical brake, but there was a snag which I can't fully recall.  Seems to me that it was a clearance issue with the hub, or in arranging an abutment for the torque stop peg."

 

I might be able to get more out of him in a week or so....

Bruce

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by Gordon Johnston at August 25. 2017

The Tri/BSA conical hub brake didn't have a particularly great reputation. Not generally thought of as better than a Norton TLS setup. Is it worth the effort?

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by Andrew Heathwood at August 26. 2017

Agreed Gordon.

They weren't known as 'Comical Hubs' for nothing {#emotions_dlg.smile}

Andy

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by mark_woodward at August 26. 2017

I have one fitted to my BSA Triple, many owners of these bikes upgrade them to a disc setup but I wanted to keep the 'authentic' look of the bike. When purchased the comical front brake had very little retarding affect (downright scary!). I changed the brake linings, had the drums skimmed and fitted 'Mutz-Nutz' brake arm extenders. After careful set-up the brake actually works quite well. Opinion is that the earlier BSA/Triumph full-width TLS of the late '60s was a much better brake - better than the Norton TLS design fitted to the early Commandos.

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at August 28. 2017

Thanks for information, I will research some more..!

 

Cheers

 

 

John H

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at December 01. 2017

Found some Brake tests in which the  Conical hub comes out quite well, with an equal rating to the 1968-1970 BSA Triumph brake, only Moto Guzzi V7 , Benelli Tornado, Suzuki GT's and Harley Davidson twin drums fairing better, except for exotic  stuff, 10 inch drums, Fontana, Ceriani, Grimeca, Oldani & Yamaha  Race drums, often which are 4 shoe units!

The Commando unit rates much lower down, plus anything designed that needs a stiffening plate means essentially something inherent in the initial design must be inadequate.

People in the UK make silly rhymes up and believe this as truth! In most cases it is bad maintenance or people who just don't grasp how things can work more effectively when time is taken to adjust and maintain them properly Having said that often with a little thought manufactured units can be improved on, even after sadly, 50 years factory inspired development!

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by Colin Peterson at December 01. 2017

I had an A65 with the late '60s TLS on the front for a while, I remember having no complaints about it. The brake, that is – the vibration, on the other hand ... I've also heard that the conical hub TLS just needs setting up right. If the Commando TLS works better with a stiffener, would that be the easiest and cheapest option?

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by anna jeannette Dixon at December 02. 2017

Previously john_hall1 wrote:

Found some Brake tests in which the  Conical hub comes out quite well, with an equal rating to the 1968-1970 BSA Triumph brake, only Moto Guzzi V7 , Benelli Tornado, Suzuki GT's and Harley Davidson twin drums fairing better, except for exotic  stuff, 10 inch drums, Fontana, Ceriani, Grimeca, Oldani & Yamaha  Race drums, often which are 4 shoe units!

The Commando unit rates much lower down, plus anything designed that needs a stiffening plate means essentially something inherent in the initial design must be inadequate.

People in the UK make silly rhymes up and believe this as truth! In most cases it is bad maintenance or people who just don't grasp how things can work more effectively when time is taken to adjust and maintain them properly Having said that often with a little thought manufactured units can be improved on, even after sadly, 50 years factory inspired development!

 

hello john you have forgotten one maker of racing brakes Robinson 10inch 4leading shoe and 12-inch leading shoe 4 LS  the best TLS brake and self-adjusting were on my Wartburg 353mk1  estate it stopped that well it would throw you through the windscreen if you were not careful, and these engines could be tuned quite easy if you know what your doing  the engines were very robust and would take lots of hammer on the motorways as long as you were using the right oil and  mixed well I always  used morris 2T oils and clocked up over 200,000 with no bother engine were easy to strip aside of the road you could remove them in 20 minuits and remove the crank and pistons without removing the cylinder head, you turn in on its head and remove six m8 bolts and then 8 x m10 bolts removed the chrankcase bottom half and then the crank and  pistons and refitted them the same way I nad a number of cranks and piston sets all new one crank I fitted had kawasaki z1000 race bearing fitted and the bloc reported and tunend it was really fast hit 110 easy and stayed there all days  if you wanted to I fiitted a duel currcet and servo braking system with new copper pipes made a big diffrence very keen brakes then I do miss the old burg it was a very usfull motor  and had a lot of carring space, in the back you could get a double bed inside,   away keep doing your resceach yours anna j

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by Mikael Ridderstad at December 02. 2017

Hi John, when you mention Harley Davidson, I guess you refer to H-D Aermacchi. Remember the 350 racer had more than adequate brakes. Front was the best 4LS I've ever tried. Rear was a bit scary so we disconnected one shoe. I've read that they was made by Fontana.

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by Andrew Heathwood at December 02. 2017

Hi John

Are these the brake tests you are referring to?

http://victorylibrary.com/brit/2LS-table.htm

Very interesting reading and I'm happy to 'stand corrected' on the performance of the conical hub 2LS.  You can't beat some real data.

I do remember at the time that these brakes were not well received - I had a 1969 650 Triumph with the earlier 2LS - but some of this looks to have been the usual resistance to change and self-criticism that Brits sometimes thrive on.

All the best with your endeavours.

Andy

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by ian_soady at December 02. 2017

That table is interesting but just gives theoretical performance. As I remember it, one of the main gripes with the conical hub was the short cam length which didn't give enough mechanical advantage. As the outer cable operated one cam and the inner the other, effective travel was double what it would have been with a link rod as on the earlier Triumph brake (and indeed the Norton one). Hence mechanical advantage was about half.

 

http://sumpmagazine.com/classic-bike-workshop/images/conical-hub-brake-complete.jpg

 

http://www.anglo-bobbers.com/Triumph_1969/images-tr0009/1969_Triumph_Trophy_Bobber_468x366b.jpg

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at December 02. 2017

Previously Mikael Ridderstad wrote:

Hi John, when you mention Harley Davidson, I guess you refer to H-D Aermacchi. Remember the 350 racer had more than adequate brakes. Front was the best 4LS I've ever tried. Rear was a bit scary so we disconnected one shoe. I've read that they was made by Fontana.

 

The Test data was based  on the units of the Big twins.

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at December 02. 2017

Previously ian_soady wrote:

That table is interesting but just gives theoretical performance. As I remember it, one of the main gripes with the conical hub was the short cam length which didn't give enough mechanical advantage. As the outer cable operated one cam and the inner the other, effective travel was double what it would have been with a link rod as on the earlier Triumph brake (and indeed the Norton one). Hence mechanical advantage was about half.

 

http://sumpmagazine.com/classic-bike-workshop/images/conical-hub-brake-complete.jpg

 

http://www.anglo-bobbers.com/Triumph_1969/images-tr0009/1969_Triumph_Trophy_Bobber_468x366b.jpg

The results came  I believe from a variety of sources, I know there Conical hubs theoretically could suffer from lack of bulk and metal in the hub part, for heat to be dissipated through, this is why the Conical brake plate in combination with a Norton full width hub it might produce an amazing unit!

There are extended brake cam arms available for the conical hub brake plate, for greater leverage. However, perhaps the whole mechanism could be redesigned with an adjustable 8mm link bar and a different cable run, almost like a combination between the Conical Hub and earlier unit. The strength of the Conical hub over the Commando unit is the brake plate itself is of a much stronger construction and does not need a stiffening plate!

if i find an answer and a better Unit amalgamation it could help save riders of old classic machines  having to spend a lot of money at M&S on new underwear!

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at December 02. 2017

Previously Mikael Ridderstad wrote:

Hi John, when you mention Harley Davidson, I guess you refer to H-D Aermacchi. Remember the 350 racer had more than adequate brakes. Front was the best 4LS I've ever tried. Rear was a bit scary so we disconnected one shoe. I've read that they was made by Fontana.

as far as I can tell it's all Big Twin data!

See table link http://victorylibrary.com/brit/2LS-table.htm

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by Andrew Heathwood at December 02. 2017

Thought I'd have a look for some road test braking distances to contribute some practical data to the debate.  This is the best I've found so far from this thread http://www.britbike.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=322268

February 1968, Cycle, 1968 TR6R
Acceleration 0 - 60 ...................5.9 sec
Standing Start 1/4 Mile ..............14.2 sec @ 92.1 MPH

March 1969, Cycle World, 1969 TR6R
Stopping Distance from 30 MPH .........38 Ft
Stopping Distance from 60 MPH ........147 Ft
Standing Start 1/4 Mile ..............14.85 sec @ 89.28 MPH

February 1970, Cycle Guide, 1970 T120R
Stopping Distance from 30 MPH .........33 Ft
Acceleration 0 - 60 ...................5.1 sec

June 1972, Cycle World, 1972 T120RV
Stopping Distance from 30 MPH .........29 Ft
Stopping Distance from 60 MPH ........118 Ft
Acceleration 0 - 60 ..................5.7 sec
Standing Start 1/4 Mile ..............13.91 @ 94.53 MPH

May 1973, Cycle World, 1973 T140V
Stopping Distance from 30 MPH .........30 Ft
Stopping Distance from 60 MPH ........117 Ft
Acceleration 0 - 60 ..................5.1 sec
Standing Start 1/4 Mile ..............13.65 @ 93.94 MPH

The 69-70 bikes would have had the original 2LS, the 72 bike would have had the conical hubs, the 73 bike the standard front disk.  Although riders and conditions will vary, on the face of it the conical hub TLS braked bike compares well.

Andy

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at December 02. 2017

Previously Colin Peterson wrote:

I had an A65 with the late '60s TLS on the front for a while, I remember having no complaints about it. The brake, that is – the vibration, on the other hand ... I've also heard that the conical hub TLS just needs setting up right. If the Commando TLS works better with a stiffener, would that be the easiest and cheapest option?

I don't like the idea of having to re-engineer a manufactured unit with an add on stiffening kit. RGM do a manufactured stiffer Brake plate which is a better option, but at I think  £350 + VAT, I may be able to come up with a cheaper solution using a more interesting route!

Attachments

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at December 02. 2017

Previously Andrew Heathwood wrote:

Thought I'd have a look for some road test braking distances to contribute some practical data to the debate.  This is the best I've found so far from this thread http://www.britbike.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=322268

February 1968, Cycle, 1968 TR6R
Acceleration 0 - 60 ...................5.9 sec
Standing Start 1/4 Mile ..............14.2 sec @ 92.1 MPH

March 1969, Cycle World, 1969 TR6R
Stopping Distance from 30 MPH .........38 Ft
Stopping Distance from 60 MPH ........147 Ft
Standing Start 1/4 Mile ..............14.85 sec @ 89.28 MPH

February 1970, Cycle Guide, 1970 T120R
Stopping Distance from 30 MPH .........33 Ft
Acceleration 0 - 60 ...................5.1 sec

June 1972, Cycle World, 1972 T120RV
Stopping Distance from 30 MPH .........29 Ft

Stopping Distance from 60 MPH ........118 Ft
Acceleration 0 - 60 ..................5.7 sec
Standing Start 1/4 Mile ..............13.91 @ 94.53 MPH

May 1973, Cycle World, 1973 T140V
Stopping Distance from 30 MPH .........30 Ft
Stopping Distance from 60 MPH ........117 Ft
Acceleration 0 - 60 ..................5.1 sec
Standing Start 1/4 Mile ..............13.65 @ 93.94 MPH

The 69-70 bikes would have had the original 2LS, the 72 bike would have had the conical hubs, the 73 bike the standard front disk.  Although riders and conditions will vary, on the face of it the conical hub TLS braked bike compares well.

Andy

Thank you very interesting. I left all my Bike magazines from the 70s and 80s at a mates and when i went back 4 them they had gone!

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by david_evans at December 02. 2017

Brilliant Anna, the original post was question about 8" brakes and suddenly we're onto 10" four leading shoes and dinosaur two stroke cars. Flux capacitors next.

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at December 02. 2017

Previously Bruce Mitchell wrote:

Unfortunately he is currently too busy to provide much of an answer but it doesn't sound good.

 

"I've looked at using the conical brake, but there was a snag which I can't fully recall.  Seems to me that it was a clearance issue with the hub, or in arranging an abutment for the torque stop peg."

 

I might be able to get more out of him in a week or so....

Bruce

Thanks would be a interesting development!

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at December 02. 2017

Previously anna jeannette Dixon wrote:

Previously john_hall1 wrote:

Found some Brake tests in which the  Conical hub comes out quite well, with an equal rating to the 1968-1970 BSA Triumph brake, only Moto Guzzi V7 , Benelli Tornado, Suzuki GT's and Harley Davidson twin drums fairing better, except for exotic  stuff, 10 inch drums, Fontana, Ceriani, Grimeca, Oldani & Yamaha  Race drums, often which are 4 shoe units!

The Commando unit rates much lower down, plus anything designed that needs a stiffening plate means essentially something inherent in the initial design must be inadequate.

People in the UK make silly rhymes up and believe this as truth! In most cases it is bad maintenance or people who just don't grasp how things can work more effectively when time is taken to adjust and maintain them properly Having said that often with a little thought manufactured units can be improved on, even after sadly, 50 years factory inspired development!

 

hello john you have forgotten one maker of racing brakes Robinson 10inch 4leading shoe and 12-inch leading shoe 4 LS  the best TLS brake and self-adjusting were on my Wartburg 353mk1  estate it stopped that well it would throw you through the windscreen if you were not careful, and these engines could be tuned quite easy if you know what your doing  the engines were very robust and would take lots of hammer on the motorways as long as you were using the right oil and  mixed well I always  used morris 2T oils and clocked up over 200,000 with no bother engine were easy to strip aside of the road you could remove them in 20 minuits and remove the crank and pistons without removing the cylinder head, you turn in on its head and remove six m8 bolts and then 8 x m10 bolts removed the chrankcase bottom half and then the crank and  pistons and refitted them the same way I nad a number of cranks and piston sets all new one crank I fitted had kawasaki z1000 race bearing fitted and the bloc reported and tunend it was really fast hit 110 easy and stayed there all days  if you wanted to I fiitted a duel currcet and servo braking system with new copper pipes made a big diffrence very keen brakes then I do miss the old burg it was a very usfull motor  and had a lot of carring space, in the back you could get a double bed inside,   away keep doing your resceach yours anna j

Anna, Race drums are different beasts are they not, they aren't much cop for road riding too fierce and too big air scoops and full of holes!

Cheers

 

John H

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at December 02. 2017

Previously david_evans wrote:

Brilliant Anna, the original post was question about 8" brakes and suddenly we're onto 10" four leading shoes and dinosaur two stroke cars. Flux capacitors next.

You rumbled a new book an Inter-Galactic Wartburg, powered by dead carbon life-forms, braked by servo-assisted drums, able to travel at warp speeds and manufactures spares for old Norton's as it transverses the skies, because the NOC can't seem to get their act together! Co-Pilot is Phil Hannam, it also has the ability to complete a return journey, unlike the technology riddled new cars and motorbikes being foisted on us by meddling politicians and self-interested parties and is not subjected to ridiculous EU Laws!  Tesla rules and Brexit is emblazoned across the hull and anyone who mentions 961's and Limp mode are instantly vaporised!

In another altered reality, NOC Exec are instantly put in a state of stasis and Norvil & others,  Ebay, prices have tumbled down to realistic values so Owners can have a spending binge!

Meanwhile in a another room, (the Boot), Pa Norton is resurrected cloned  and reprinted on a 3D Printer and will save Norton yet again and a Blueprinted Geoff Duke is almost ready to roll, incidentally the Commando never existed either and has been wiped from history, whilst as "Warty1" blasts across the skies, Constellations are drifting past in the shape of feather-bed frames and Bracebridge Street Factory from various angles.....bliss

alls well that ends well......

Merry Christmas to one and all!

 

 

John H

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by paul_standeven at December 03. 2017

I once knew a race engineer who spent hours making a '68-70 BSA / Triumph 2ls brake plate into a conical hub, because the conical was such a bad stopper.  It involved a lot of welding and re-machining.  Actually, that '68-70 plate goes easily into a Norton alloy shell. That's what he would have done had he known.  Machine off the outer rim of the BSA 2ls plate, and make a spacer between wheel bearing and plate, perhaps dress off part of the brake lining as it will run on the alloy on the outer edge of the shell, and make a brake torque pin to fit the forks

I used to have a BSA with the '68 type brake, and it was a real honey.  So light that (stationary) you could squeeze the lever  to the bars like a clutch lever, but you could decide exactly how much tyre squeal you wanted.  I have never tried a more friendly yet powerful drum brake.

The real problem with the conical brake plate is leverage.  That's why you can buy accessory brake arms which are 1.5 and 2 times standard length.  Apart from that, it requires careful setting up, particularly to prevent the weight of the cable pushing on the upper cam.  That done, it's quite OK as a brake.  It may be significant that the late '60s / early '70s BMW bikes fitted with a similar cable arrangement have the cable approaching the brake horizontally.

Paul

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by anna jeannette Dixon at December 03. 2017

Previously david_evans wrote:

Brilliant Anna, the original post was question about 8" brakes and suddenly we're onto 10" four leading shoes and dinosaur two stroke cars. Flux capacitors next.

hello there is nothing wrong with remanissing    the dinosaur two-stroke car were  very reliable  unlike cars of today that are not reliable  and you pop the hud and you can't find the dipstick  never mind the spark plugs,  and as for fixing it at the side of the road forget it, phone the AA and take to the scrapyard, rock and roll old cars are better then the new ones my old Nissan Bluebird still passed an EU type 6 emissions test in the  mot  without a cat fitted  it runs that clean   and that dinosaur car blow off a v8 ranchcro  on the m62  going over the peninens, the ranchcro set on fire from underneath  it was in flames as I looked back in my mirror we were hit well over 110 mph that a tuned 353 wartburg 991 estate for you  these cars have won the 1000cc class,  thousand lakes rally many times  the toughest rally in the world makes darkar look like a cake walk,    yours anna j

Attachments

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at December 06. 2017

Previously paul_standeven wrote:

I once knew a race engineer who spent hours making a '68-70 BSA / Triumph 2ls brake plate into a conical hub, because the conical was such a bad stopper.  It involved a lot of welding and re-machining.  Actually, that '68-70 plate goes easily into a Norton alloy shell. That's what he would have done had he known.  Machine off the outer rim of the BSA 2ls plate, and make a spacer between wheel bearing and plate, perhaps dress off part of the brake lining as it will run on the alloy on the outer edge of the shell, and make a brake torque pin to fit the forks

I used to have a BSA with the '68 type brake, and it was a real honey.  So light that (stationary) you could squeeze the lever  to the bars like a clutch lever, but you could decide exactly how much tyre squeal you wanted.  I have never tried a more friendly yet powerful drum brake.

The real problem with the conical brake plate is leverage.  That's why you can buy accessory brake arms which are 1.5 and 2 times standard length.  Apart from that, it requires careful setting up, particularly to prevent the weight of the cable pushing on the upper cam.  That done, it's quite OK as a brake.  It may be significant that the late '60s / early '70s BMW bikes fitted with a similar cable arrangement have the cable approaching the brake horizontally.

Paul

Yes,, from what I can gather it designed round BMW unit, I also heard the Brake shoes are a car type and the same as an MG! The slots in the shoes are thought to weaken the shoes and have no function on the BSA/Triumph unit!

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_hall1 at December 06. 2017

One things for sure the BSA/ Triumph Conical Front Brake plate is massively webbed, has pillars and has adjusters too it also relies on sliding housed tappets, activated by cams to get movement which can be greased and has a scoop and cooling slots cast in it, on the grounds of strength alone it should make for a better option! Cable runs can be tailored to some extent too.

Some B25 owners and B50 owners both of which I think have the slightly smaller 7" unit, claim they can virtually stand their bikes on the front wheel!  Okay, I know the weight is down on a 4 cylinder Special based round a Dominator, but I will have the larger 8" unit to play with if needed!

 

Cheers

 

 

John H

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_holmes at December 06. 2017

Pre conical the TLS on B25 and B44 was 7", all conical front TLS are 8" even on the B25.

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by paul_standeven at December 07. 2017

There was a 6" conical front for off road bikes like the B50 and B25

Paul

 

Previously john_holmes wrote:

Pre conical the TLS on B25 and B44 was 7", all conical front TLS are 8" even on the B25.

Re: BSA Triumph Conical Hub Brake Twin Leading Shoe adaption:

Posted by john_holmes at December 07. 2017

That's why I said TLS conical, the 6" conical was not TLS  and fitted to the street scrambler versions.

Powered by Ploneboard

This message board is a technical forum for Nortons in general. Club related and non-technical items should be put in News and Views and if posted here, will be deleted

This is Brio Diazo Plone Theme